The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Politieke transformasie as ’n ideologiese denkraamwerk: ’n beleidsdinamiese analise en perspektief
Open accessAbstract
Political transformation as an ideological framework: an analysis of dynamic policies and perspectives The period after 1994 can be described as the period of political transformation in South Africa. With a revolutionary point of departure, political transformation established itself as a political ideology in South Africa. In general political ideologies are characterised by a hard core of ideas that is extremely difficult to change and a softer periphery (policy application context) that is more pragmatic and dynamic in nature. Changes are normally taking place on the level of the periphery which serves as a protective belt for the hard core of the ideology. Political transformation as an ideology is no exception to this general role and currently needs changes in its protective belt to ensure its survival. This article investigates the ways in which the transformation ideology can reposition itself in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- BALL, T. 1976. The workshop -from pradigms to research programs: towards a post-kuhnian political science. American journal of political science, 20(1):151-177.
- BRATTON, M. & VAN DE WALLE, N. 1997. Democratic experiments in Africa: regime transitions in comparitive perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- BRINTON, C. 1965. The anatomy of revolution. New York: Prentice Hall. (Revised and expanded version.)
- DUVENHAGE, A. 2005a. Politieke transformasie -'n konseptuele oriëntering en Suid-Afrikaanse toepassing. Acta academia, 37(3):1-40.
- DUVENHAGE, A. 2006. Die leierskapstryd binne die ANC. Woord en daad, 46(398):16-21.
- GELDENHUYS, D. 1999. Staatsverval. Politeia, 18(2):37-50.
- HUMAN, P. 1998. Yenza: a blueprint for transformation. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
- LAKATOS, I. 1970. Falcification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. (In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A., eds. Critisism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 91-196.)
- MSOMI, S. 2007. Broad church: a devided house. City press: 21, 1 Jul.
- NETSITENZE, J. 2007. Report lets us in on SA's development indicators. City press: 30, 24 Jun.
Cited by
Radical land reform in South Africa - a comparative perspective?
Jankielsohn, R., & Duvenhage, A. (2017) · Journal for Contemporary History · doi:10.18820/24150509/jch42.v2.1 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Duvenhage, A.
- Affiliations
- North-West University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Duvenhage, A.
- Venue
- Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
- Published
- 2007-07-27
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0023-270X (ISSN-L)
- 2304-8557
- OpenAlex
- W2066253008
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- af
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › South African History and Culture
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in South Africa
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
- Keywords
- political transition, political ideology, post-apartheid South Africa, policy dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
