The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of hip fracture: Worldwide geographic variation
Open accessAbstract
Osteoporosis is a major health problem, especially in elderly populations, and is associated with fragility fractures at the hip, spine, and wrist. Hip fracture contributes to both morbidity and mortality in the elderly. The demographics of world populations are set to change, with more elderly living in developing countries, and it has been estimated that by 2050 half of hip fractures will occur in Asia. This review conducted using the PubMed database describes the incidence of hip fracture in different regions of the world and discusses the possible causes of this wide geographic variation. The analysis of data from different studies show a wide geographic variation across the world, with higher hip fracture incidence reported from industrialized countries as compared to developing countries. The highest hip fracture rates are seen in North Europe and the US and lowest in Latin America and Africa. Asian countries such as Kuwait, Iran, China, and Hong Kong show intermediate hip fracture rates. There is also a north–south gradient seen in European studies, and more fractures are seen in the north of the US than in the south. The factors responsible of this variation are population demographics (with more elderly living in countries with higher incidence rates) and the influence of ethnicity, latitude, and environmental factors. The understanding of this changing geographic variation will help policy makers to develop strategies to reduce the burden of hip fractures in developing countries such as India, which will face the brunt of this problem over the coming decades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide
Kanis, J. A., Odén, A., McCloskey, E. V., Johansson, H., Wahl, D. A., Cooper, C., & on behalf of the IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life (2012) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3 · Cited by 1,379
Self-citationManagement of Acute Hip Fracture
Bhandari, M., & Swiontkowski, M. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp1611090 · Cited by 649
Rommens, P. M., & Hofmann, A. (2013) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.023 · Cited by 531
Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age
Ensrud, K. E. (2013) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glt092 · Cited by 456
Papadimitriou, N., Tsilidis, K. K., Orfanos, P., Benetou, V., Ntzani, E. E., Soerjomataram, I., Künn-Nelen, A., Pettersson-Kymmer, U., Eriksson, S., Brenner, H., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30046-4 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhanwal, D. K., Dennison, E. M., Harvey, N. C., & Cooper, C.
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-22
- ISSN
- 0019-5413 (ISSN-L)
- 1998-3727
- OpenAlex
- W2162434259
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of hip fracture: Worldwide geographic variation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/0019-5413.73656
- The paper
- Dhanwal, D. K., Dennison, E. M., Harvey, N. C., & Cooper, C. (2011). Epidemiology of hip fracture: Worldwide geographic variation. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.73656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.