Cited by 425Healthcare Quality and ManagementPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Impact of Accreditation on the Quality of Healthcare Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Open access
Alkhenizan, Abdullah, Shaw, Charles·2011·Annals of Saudi Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Accreditation is usually a voluntary program in which trained external peer reviewers evaluate a healthcare organization's compliance and compare it with pre-established performance standards. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of accreditation programs on the quality of healthcare services METHODS: We did a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the impact of accreditation programs on the quality of healthcare services. Several databases were systematically searched, including Medline, Embase, Healthstar, and Cinhal. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies evaluating the impact of accreditation were identified. The majority of the studies showed general accreditation for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), trauma, ambulatory surgical care, infection control and pain management; and subspecialty accreditation programs to significantly improve the process of care provided by healthcare services by improving the structure and organization of healthcare facilities. Several studies showed that general accreditation programs significantly improve clinical outcomes and the quality of care of these clinical conditions and showed a significant positive impact of subspecialty accreditation programs in improving clinical outcomes in different subspecialties, including sleep medicine, chest pain management and trauma management. CONCLUSIONS: There is consistent evidence that shows that accreditation programs improve the process of care provided by healthcare services. There is considerable evidence to show that accreditation programs improve clinical outcomes of a wide spectrum of clinical conditions. Accreditation programs should be supported as a tool to improve the quality of healthcare services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0256-4947.83204

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accreditation is typically a voluntary program sponsored by a non-governmental agency using external peer reviews to assess whether healthcare organizations adhere to pre-established standards.

    “Accreditation is typically a voluntary program sponsored by a non-governmental agency using external peer reviews to assess whether healthcare organizations adhere to pre-established standards [346].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Montagu D Accreditation and other external quality assessment systems for healthcare: Review of experience and lessons learned Last accessed on 2003 London Department for international development health systems resource centre Available from: http://www.dfidhealthrc.org/publications/health_service_delivery/Accreditation.pdf
  2. [33]Pomey MP Contandriopoulos AP François P Bertrand D Accreditation as a tool for organisational change Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2004 17 113 24 15301268

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alkhenizan, A., & Shaw, C.
Affiliations
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA)
  • European Society for Quality in Healthcare, Limerick, Ireland
Corresponding author
Alkhenizan, Abdullah
Venue
Annals of Saudi Medicine
Published
2011-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
407-416
ISSN
  • 0256-4947 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-4466
OpenAlex
W2128099173
Cited by
425
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Annals of Saudi Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
American College of Surgeons
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
healthcare accreditation, quality of healthcare services, clinical outcomes, process of care, acute myocardial infarction, trauma care, outpatient surgery, infection control, pain management, sleep medicine, chest pain management
MeSH terms
Accreditation, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Peer Review, Quality of Health Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review