Cited by 5Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Allergic contact dermatitis to antiseptic medicated dressing applied on phlebotomy site

Open access
Marwaha, Neelam, Dhawan, HariKrishan, Arora, Satyam, Sachdev, Suchet, Sharma, RR·2010·Asian Journal of Transfusion Science

Abstract

Adhesive dressing application to the phlebotomy site is a norm that is usually followed by all blood banks as postdonation care. The purpose is to provide an environment conducive for healing i.e. prevent infection. However whether we need a medicated antiseptic dressing is of doubtful value. The risk of infection at phlebotomy site is estimated to be 1 in 200,000,[1] whereas the reported allergy to medicated antiseptics could reach upto 15%.[2]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0973-6247.67020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bajpai M, Gupta S, Chatterjee K. Are medicated adhesive bands at the phlebotomy site useful? Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2009;25:86-87 · DOI
  2. Guijarro, 1999, Allergic contact dermatitis to polyethylene glycol and nitrofurazone.Am J Contact Dermat, 226

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • National blood donor vigilance programme of India

    Bisht, A., Marwaha, N., Arora, S., Patidar, G. K., & Chhabra, R. (2021) · Asian Journal of Transfusion Science · doi:10.4103/ajts.ajts_195_20 · Cited by 20

    “In blood donation, these might be due to allergy to disinfectant constituents of medicated bandage.[21] Taking the allergic history of donors before blood donations can prevent this kind of reaction.”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Metadata

Authors
Marwaha, N., Dhawan, H., Arora, S., Sachdev, S., & Sharma, R.
Affiliations
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Venue
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Published
2010
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
133
ISSN
0973-6247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116503653
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Transfusion Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Keywords
allergic contact dermatitis, adhesive dressings, antiseptic allergy, wound infection prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review