Cited by 41Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

The effect of health education on the knowledge, attitude, and uptake of free Pap smear among female teachers in Birnin-Kebbi, North-Western Nigeria

Open access
Adamu, AN, Abiola, AO, Ibrahim, MTO·2012·Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

Introduction The Routine Pap smear test has successfully reduced the incidence of invasive cervical cancer in the presence of a proper structure for its implementation. This study was designed to assess the effect of health education on the knowledge, attitude, and uptake of Pap smear among female teachers. Materials and methods It was a quasi-experimental, controlled study with a pre-test, post-test design. A total of 100 respondents were recruited for each of the intervention and control groups, by the multistage sampling technique. Results The mean knowledge score of cervical cancer was low in both the interventions (25.5% ± 10.5) and control groups (18.9% ± 10.0) at baseline; a significant rise to 57.2% ± 20.7 was recorded after the intervention in the Intervention group (P Conclusion Health education had no significant effect on the uptake of a free Pap smear among teachers. Despite the significant improvement in the attitude toward the test, many respondents did not like the test after than before the intervention. Sociocultural issues such as the gender of the sample collector, and system factors like few service delivery points, and the time required to access the service could have contributed to the poor uptake recorded in this study. A program designed to improve routine cervical cancer screening by Pap smear should therefore address not only the knowledge and cost, but also the sociocultural and systemic factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/1119-3077.100632

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adamu, A., Abiola, A., & Ibrahim, M.
Corresponding author
Adamu, AN
Venue
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2012
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
326
ISSN
1119-3077 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105139193
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
health education, Pap smear, cervical cancer screening, cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes toward screening, screening uptake, women teachers, socio-cultural barriers, Birnin Kebbi
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Status, Female, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Vaginal Smears, Health Behavior, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review