Cited by 114Global Maternal and Child HealthMedication Adherence and CompliancePublic Health and Nutrition

Determinants of compliance to iron supplementation among pregnant women in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria

Open access
Ugwu, EO, Olibe, AO, Obi, SN, Ugwu, AO·2014·Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia in pregnancy is highly prevalent among antenatal clinic attendees in Enugu, Nigeria despite the practice of routine iron supplementation in pregnancy. The major problem with iron supplementation in pregnancy is compliance, and this may be a potential driver to the persistent high prevalence of anemia in this population. OBJECTIVES: To find out the compliance rate and determinants of compliance to iron supplementation among pregnant women in Enugu, southeastern Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of eligible pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Ituku/Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria between April 1, 2012 and January 31, 2013. RESULTS: The knowledge of iron supplementation was 76.3% ( n = 302), however, the compliance rate was 65.9% ( n = 261). Tertiary level of education and high social class were factors significantly associated with compliance to iron supplementation after adjusting for other factors in the binary logistic regression analysis ( P < 0.05). The major barriers to compliance to iron supplementation included gastrointestinal side effects of iron supplements (41.7%), non-affordability of iron supplements (28.3%), and forgetfulness (15.0%) among the antenatal mothers. CONCLUSION: The compliance rate of 65.9% for iron supplementation by pregnant mothers in Enugu can further be improved by providing the drug free of charge in the short term and improvement in education and socioeconomic class of the populace in the long run.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/1119-3077.141427

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ugwu, E., Olibe, A., Obi, S., & Ugwu, A.
Affiliations
University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (NG)
Venue
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2014
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
608
ISSN
1119-3077 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983017412
Cited by
114
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
Keywords
iron supplementation, medication adherence, pregnant women, anemia in pregnancy, prenatal care, determinants of compliance, gastrointestinal adverse effects, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, Enugu
MeSH terms
Adult, Anemia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Nigeria, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic, Prenatal Care, Iron, Dietary, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review