Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 69Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsHealth and Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Factors Adversely Affecting Student Learning in the Clinical Learning Environment: A Student Perspective

Dolmans, DHJM, Wolfhagen, IHAP, Heineman, E, Scherpbier, AJJA·2008·Education for Health

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate, from the students' perspective, factors that may adversely affect student learning in the clinical environment. METHOD: Medical students evaluated the perceived effectiveness of the clinical learning environment at the end of various clerkship rotations, such as surgery, gynaecology, paediatrics, ophthalmology. After each clerkship students answered a standard questionnaire containing closed-ended questions about supervision, patient contacts, organisation, learning effectiveness and the learning climate, as well as one open-ended question about the clerkship-site's perceived weaknesses. Because supervision is crucial to the quality of clerkships but often lacking, we compared clerkship-sites with relatively low and high ratings on supervision and analysed students' comments on the weaknesses of their clerkship-sites. RESULTS: Factors that students perceived were inhibiting learning were too few opportunities for students to examine patients independently and lack of time for supervision. In addition, lack of observation, insufficient feedback, negative attitudes of the staff towards students and teaching, the presence of too many students at one time, too few educational sessions, and poor organisation were mentioned as perceived weaknesses in open-ended comments. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these students' perceptions, effective clerkships should present students with patients with a variety of health problems who can be examined both independently and with supervision. Continuity of supervision is important and can be addressed by assigning a teacher or mentor to each student.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/1357-6283.101553

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., Heineman, E., & Scherpbier, A.
Venue
Education for Health
Published
2008
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
32
ISSN
1357-6283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995895034
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Education for Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
clinical learning environment, medical students, clinical rotations, student supervision, student learning, student perceptions, feedback, learning climate, mentoring, teacher-student relationship, patient contact, educational organisations
MeSH terms
Clinical Clerkship, Learning, Mentors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.