The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal Impact Factor: Its Use, Significance and Limitations
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“An IF is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the ''average article'' in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. 68”
From Randomized Controlled Trials of Mindfulness and Acceptance-Based Interventions Over the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis. (2021) · cites this paper as [68]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Garfield, 2006, The history and meaning of the journal impact factor, JAMA, 90
- Esposito, 2011, The impact factor: Its use, misuse, and significance, Int J Prosthet Dent, 85
- Malathi, 2012, The intricacies of impact factor and mid-term review of editorship, Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 1
- Garfield, 1996, How can impact factors be improved?, BMJ, 411
- Rossner, 2007, Show me the data, J Cell Biol, 1091
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Indicadores métricos en los documentos científicos
Escamilla-Ortiz, A. (2016) · doi:10.35366/72773
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Conservative Dentistry, Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College and Research Centre, Ghaziabad
- Department of Conservative Dentistry, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Gwalior
- Department of Pedodontics, ITS Dental College, Ghaziabad
- Department of Conservative Dentistry, Vaidik Dental College and Research Centre, Daman
- Corresponding author
- Sharma, Mohit
- Venue
- World Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 146-146
- ISSN
- 1450-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-3312
- PMC
- PMC4150161
- OpenAlex
- W2068355084
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- World Journal of Nuclear Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- journal impact factor, bibliometric analysis, journal evaluation, research evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
