Trans-synaptic degeneration as a mechanism of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis
Open accessAbstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is regarded as an immune-mediated, demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system, however neuroaxonal degeneration is accepted as the principal substrate of disability accumulation (Dutta and Trapp, 2011). Neurodegeneration occurs throughout the course of MS and is detectable even in the earliest stages of the disease (Azevedo et al., 2018). Mechanisms of neurodegeneration in MS are complex and not completely understood. Neuro-axonal transection or degeneration can occur within acutely or chronically demyelinated MS lesions, and also within normal-appearing white and gray matter (Dutta and Trapp, 2011). At a tissue level, pathologic contributors to neuro-axonal degeneration may include inflammatory injury, loss of trophic support, retrograde and anterograde degeneration, failure of remyelination, impaired axonal transport, microglial activation, mitochondrial injury, energy failure, oxidative injury, iron accumulation and tissue hypoxia (Dutta and Trapp, 2011; Mahad et al., 2015). One putative mechanism of neurodegeneration is trans-synaptic degeneration – whereby injury to a neuron or axon leads to the degeneration of synaptically-connected neurons. Theoretically, trans-synaptic degeneration may proceed anterogradely (“dying forward”) or retrogradely (“dying back”), ultimately resulting in the loss of neurons in discrete but distant central nervous system locations (Figures 1 and 2). Based on this mechanism, trans-synaptic degeneration could occur in MS both in demyelinated tissue and in normal-appearing tissue. However, while trans-synaptic degeneration is biologically plausible in MS, and supported by indirect evidence (Rocca et al., 2013; Gabilondo et al., 2014), the “real time” documentation of trans-synaptic degeneration has been challenging. Pathological studies of MS are typically not suitable for assessing trans-synaptic changes, since post-mortem studies can only assess a single pathological timepoint, and post-mortem samples of MS brains are usually acquired from older patients – often years after the phase of the disease involving overt inflammatory activity. Furthermore, radiological capturing of trans-synaptic degeneration in vivo has been a major challenge due to the limitations of imaging technology and the complex synaptically-connected central nervous system networks which can be affected by many MS lesions.Figure 1: Functionally-eloquent organization of the afferent visual pathway.The afferent visual pathway is a sensory pathway comprised of three neurons. The 1st order neurons are the shortest neurons in the pathway and are entirely unmyelinated. The cell bodies of the 1st order neurons lie in the retinal inner nuclear layer (INL), with the axons traveling to the retinal ganglion cell layer (GCL) where they synapse with the cell bodies of the 2nd order neurons. In the top row of images, the INL and GCL are highlighted here on a spectral domain optical coherence tomography image of a healthy retina (Spectralis HD-OCT, Heidelberg, Germany). The axons of the 2nd order neuron pass through the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and coalesce to make up the optic nerve, becoming myelinated after they pass through lamina cribrosa. As illustrated in the second row of images, axons from the nasal half of the retina are organized within the optic nerve and cross over to the contralateral cerebral hemisphere at the optic chiasm, while axons from the temporal half of the retina remain uncrossed and continue their path within the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere. After traversing the optic tracts, the axons of the 2nd order neurons synapse with the cell bodies of the 3rd order neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus, with each thalamus receiving signals from the right and left eye, due to the crossed and uncrossed nature of the pathway. The axons of the 3rd order neurons then travel within the optic radiations to reach the primary visual cortex of the occipital lobe. From: https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6ty03rf.Figure 2: Neuroaxonal degeneration in the afferent visual pathway following axonal injury.This figure illustrates the potential patterns of neuroaxonal degeneration that may occur after injury to an axon in the afferent visual pathway (e.g., with optic neuritis), or in other synaptically-connected pathways. Following axonal injury, the affected neuron may degenerate in both an anterograde (“dying forward”) or retrograde (“dying back”) direction. Following degeneration of the injured neuron, neurodegeneration may proceed trans-synaptically to the other neurons in the chain, again in an anterograde or retrograde direction, resulting in loss of distant uninjured but synaptically-connected neurons. From: https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6ty03rf.The visual pathway is frequently probed in the examination of neurodegenerative processes in MS, and episodes of acute optic neuritis (AON) represent opportune circumstances for t
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assessing GCIPL thickness maps for patterns of regional macular injury might provide insight into vascular etiologies of optic neuropathy, such as when altitudinal thinning is present, or optic chiasm, optic tract, thalamic and/or retrogeniculate pathology.
“Assessing the GCIPL thickness maps for patterns of regional macular injury might provide insight into vascular etiologies of optic neuropathy, such as when altitudinal thinning is present, or optic chiasm, optic tract, thalamic and/or retrogeniculate pathology. 80 -83”
From The use of optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in the 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (2025) · cites this paper as [82]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- [1]Al-Louzi OA Bhargava P Newsome SD Balcer L Frohman E Crainiceanu C Calabresi PA Saidha S 2016 Outer retinal changes following acute optic neuritis Mult Scler 22 362 372 26209589 PMC4724567
- [2]Al-Louzi O Button J Newsome SD Calabresi PA Saidha S 2017 Retrograde trans-synaptic visual pathway degeneration in multiple sclerosis:a case series Mult Scler 23 1035 1039 28385128 PMC5451303
- [3]Azevedo CJ Cen SY Khadka S Liu S Kornak J Shi Y Zheng L Hauser SL Pelletier D 2018 Thalamic atrophy in multiple sclerosis:a magnetic resonance imaging marker of neurodegeneration throughout disease Ann Neurol 83 223 234 29328531 PMC6317847
- [4]Balcer LJ Raynowska J Nolan R Galetta SL Kapoor R Benedict R Phillips G LaRocca N Hudson L Rudick R 2017 Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis Mult Scler 23 734 747 28206829 PMC5407511
- [5]Balk LJ Steenwijk MD Tewarie P Daams M Killestein J Wattjes MP Vrenken H Barkhof F Polman CH Uitdehaag BMJ Petzold A 2015 Bidirectional trans-synaptic axonal degeneration in the visual pathway in multiple sclerosis J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86 419 424 24973342
- [6]Cadavid D Balcer L Galetta S Aktas O Ziemssen T Vanopdenbosch L Frederiksen J Skeen M Jaffe GJ Butzkueven H Ziemssen F Massacesi L Chai Y Xu L Freeman S RENEW Study Investigators (2017) Safety and efficacy of opicinumab in acute optic neuritis (RENEW):a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial Lancet Neurol 16 189 199 28229892
- [7]Dutta R Trapp BD 2011 Mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction and degeneration in multiple sclerosis Prog Neurobiol 93 1 12 20946934 PMC3030928
- [8]Gabilondo I Martínez-Lapiscina EH Martínez-Heras E Fraga-Pumar E Llufriu S Ortiz S Bullich S Sepulveda M Falcon C Berenguer J Saiz A Sanchez-Dalmau B Villoslada P 2014 Trans-synaptic axonal degeneration in the visual pathway in multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol 75 98 107 24114885
- [9]Kanamori A Catrinescu M Belisle JM Costantino S Levin LA 2012 Retrograde and Wallerian axonal degeneration occur synchronously after retinal ganglion cell axotomy Am J Pathol 181 62 73 22642911 PMC3388161
- [10]Mahad DH Trapp BD Lassmann H 2015 Pathological mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis Lancet Neurol 14 183 193 25772897
- [11]Murphy OC Sotirchos ES Kalaitzidis G Vasileiou E Ehrhardt H Lambe J Kwakyi O Nguyen J Zambriczki Lee A Button J Dewey BE Newsome SD Mowry EM Fitzgerald KC Prince JL Calabresi PA Saidha S 2022 Trans-synaptic degeneration following acute optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol 93 76 87 36218157 PMC9933774
- [12]Raftopoulos R Hickman SJ Toosy A Sharrack B Mallik S Paling D Altmann DR Yiannakas MC Malladi P Sheridan R Sarrigiannis PG Hoggard N Koltzenburg M Wheeler-Kingshott C Schmierer K Giovannoni G Miller DH Kapoor R 2016 Phenytoin for neuroprotection in patients with acute optic neuritis:a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial Lancet Neurol 15 259 269 26822749
- [13]Rocca MA Mesaros S Preziosa P Pagani E Stosic-Opincal T Dujmovic-Basuroski I Drulovic J Filippi M 2013 Wallerian and trans-synaptic degeneration contribute to optic radiation damage in multiple sclerosis:a diffusion tensor MRI study Mult Scler 19 1610 1617 23572238
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saidha, S., Green, A. J., Leocani, L., Vidal-Jordana, A., Kenney, R. C., Bsteh, G., Outteryck, O., Thompson, A., Montalban, X., Coetzee, T., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00275-3 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Murphy, O. C., Calabresi, P. A., & Saidha, S.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Murphy, Olwen C.
- Venue
- Neural Regeneration Research
- Published
- 2023-04-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2682-2684
- ISSN
- 1673-5374 (ISSN-L)
- 1876-7958
- PMC
- PMC10358689
- OpenAlex
- W4377103404
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Neural Regeneration Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS082347)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- transsynaptic degeneration, multiple sclerosis, neurodegeneration, axonal degeneration, retrograde degeneration, Wallerian degeneration, demyelination, normal-appearing white matter, normal-appearing gray matter, axonal transport, remyelination, microglial activation, mitochondrial injury, oxidative damage, iron accumulation, tissue hypoxia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review