Impact of self-assessment by students on their learning
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Tutor assessment is sometimes also considered as an exercise of power by the assessor over assesses. Student self-assessment is the process by which the students gather information about and reflect on their own learning and is considered to be a very important component of learning. AIM: The primary objective of this study was to analyze the impact of self-assessment by undergraduate medical students on their subsequent academic performance. The secondary objective was to obtain the perception of students and faculty about self-assessment as a tool for enhanced learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on the evaluation of two theory tests consisting of both essay type and short answer questions, administered to students of the 1(st) year MBBS (n = 89). They self-assessed their performance after 3 days of the first test followed by marking of faculty and feedback. Then, a nonidentical theory test on the same topic with the same difficulty level was conducted after 7 days and assessed by the teachers. The feedback about the perception of students and faculty about this intervention was obtained. RESULTS: Significant improvement in the academic performance after the process of self-assessment was observed (P < 0.001). There was a significantly positive correlation between student and teacher marking (r = 0.79). Both students and faculty perceived it to be helpful for developing self-directed learning skills. CONCLUSIONS: Self-assessment can increase the interest and motivation level of students for the subjects leading to enhanced learning and better academic performance, helping them in development of critical skills for analysis of their own work.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a positive and significant relationship between teachers' assessment and peer assessment when using a scoring rubric.
“Mixed methods survey has been conducted which shows positive and significant relationship between teachers' assessment and peer assessment by using the scoring rubric to collect data for the study [24].”
From Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 115
- Authors
- Sharma, R., Jain, A., Gupta, N., Garg, S., Batta, M., & Dhir, S.
- Affiliations
- Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sharma, Rajeev
- Venue
- International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 226
- ISSN
- 2229-516X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4979309
- OpenAlex
- W2501273528
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 32.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Keywords
- self-assessment, student self-assessment, academic performance, medical students, self-directed learning, student motivation, feedback, medical education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review