Cited by 42Global Health Workforce IssuesEducation in Rural ContextsDiversity and Career in Medicine

Recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals in rural Canada: A systematic review

Koebisch, Savanna Heidi, Rix, Jacqueline, Holmes, Michelle M.·2020·Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: This review explores a pertinent issue for healthcare professionals and recruiters alike: which factors are most important in the recruitment and retention of these professionals in rural practice in Canada. Existing research concentrates on specific factors or focused populations. This review was created to explore multiple factors and a wider population of healthcare professionals, including chiropractors, osteopaths, dentists and physiotherapists. Methods: A literature search was carried out on four databases. Data from included studies were extracted, and thematic analysis was conducted on relevant findings. The quality of individual studies was assessed, and then themes were evaluated for overall confidence based on four components, using the Confidence in the Evidence for Reviews of Qualitative Research. Results: One quantitative and four qualitative articles were identified, all of which targeted physicians. Five themes – Personal/family matters, Community factors, Professional practice factors, Professional education factors and Economic factors – were generated in two domains, recruitment and retention. Forty major codes were generated through axial coding of open codes. Codes included attraction to rural lifestyle, recreational activities, Scope of practice, rural training and incentives. Scope of practice was deemed very important as a factor of recruitment, as was attraction to rural lifestyle. Incentives were found to be of little importance in influencing the recruitment of healthcare professionals, and even less important for retention. Conclusion: Wide scope of practice and attraction to the rural lifestyle were considered the most important for recruitment and to a lesser extent, retention, among the five papers studied. A lack of research was determined in the realm of factors influencing the recruitment and retention in healthcare professionals other than medical doctors in Canada. Therefore, it is recommended that further such studies investigate specific healthcare professionals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_43_19

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 42

Authors
Koebisch, S. H., Rix, J., & Holmes, M. M.
Affiliations
  • School of Chiropractic, AECC University College (Formerly Anglo-European College of Chiropractic), Bournemouth, England
  • Health Sciences University (GB)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine
Published
2020-03-28
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
67-78
ISSN
  • 1203-7796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-237X
OpenAlex
W3001874672
Cited by
42
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
rural health workforce, scope of practice, rural lifestyle, rural training, professional incentives, chiropractors, osteopaths, dentists, physiotherapists, rural Canada
MeSH terms
Canada, Health Workforce, Health Personnel, Humans, Personnel Selection, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review