Screening for gestational diabetes in pregnancy in Northwestern Ontario
Abstract
Introduction: We estimate the screening and prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in a primarily first nations obstetrical population in Northwestern Ontario. Methods: The study is an 8-year retrospective analysis of all gestational glucose challenge and tolerance tests performed at the Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre (SLMHC) laboratory from 1 January, 2010 to 31 December, 2017. Test, gestational timing and completion rate of screening were recorded, and GDM prevalence was calculated on the tested population. Screening completion rates were recorded for the subset of women who delivered at SLMHC from 2014 to 2017. Results: The average annual GDM prevalence was 12%, double the Ontario rate. Over the 8-year period, 513 patients were diagnosed with GDM among the 4298 patients screened. Patients were screened with the 2-step (90%) or the 1-step (10%) protocol. Screening occurred <20 weeks in 3%; 54% occurred in <28 weeks and 40% >28 weeks. Seventy percent of the tests were from remote nursing stations. The screening completion rate for women delivering at SLMHC in 2017 was 80.8%. Conclusion: The prevalence of GDM in Northwestern Ontario is twice the provincial rate. Most screening used the 2-step protocol; early screening was underused. Improvements in screening programming are underway and future research may match surveillance rates and results to GDM outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In northwestern Ontario, the average annual gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence was 12% (8-17%), two times higher than in all of Ontario.
“They performed an 8-year retrospective analysis, that found that the average annual GDM prevalence was 12% (8–17%), two times higher than in all of Ontario.”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [77]
In 90% of cases in northwestern Ontario, a two-step screening protocol was used to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus.
“In 90% of the cases, they used a two-step screening protocol to diagnose GDM [77].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [77]
Cites
Feig, D. S., Berger, H., Donovan, L., Godbout, A., Kader, T., Keely, E., & Sanghera, R. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.038 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Sweeting, A. N., Ross, G. P., Hyett, J., Molyneaux, L., Constantino, M., Harding, A. J., & Wong, J. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-0433 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Dyck, R., Klomp, H., Tan, L. K., Turnell, R. W., & Boctor, M. A. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.3.487 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
RETIRED: Diabetes in Pregnancy
Berger, H., Gagnon, R., & Sermer, M. (2016) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2016.04.002 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Missed follow-up opportunities using a two-step screening approach for gestational diabetes
Sievenpiper, J. L., McDonald, S. D., Grey, V., & Don-Wauchope, A. C. (2012) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.01.030 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Poirier, J., Kattini, R., Kelly, L., Madden, S., Voth, B., Dooley, J., Marazan, B., & Hummelen, R.
- Affiliations
- Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority (CA)
- Sioux Lookout Local Education Group, Sioux Lookout, Canada
- NOSM University (CA)
- Northwest Health Alliance, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Corresponding author
- Kelly, Len
- ORCID
- Kelly, Len
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine
- Published
- 2020-03-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-66
- ISSN
- 1203-7796 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-237X
- OpenAlex
- W3013076265
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, prenatal screening, glucose challenge test, oral glucose tolerance test, screening completion rates, GDM prevalence, First Nations women, screening timing, northwestern Ontario
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Ontario, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review