Cited by 7Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDiabetes Management and Research

Screening for gestational diabetes in pregnancy in Northwestern Ontario

Poirier, Jenna, Kattini, Ribal, Kelly, Len, Madden, Sharen, Voth, Brenda, Dooley, Joe, Marazan, Brent, Hummelen, Ruben·2020·Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: We estimate the screening and prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in a primarily first nations obstetrical population in Northwestern Ontario. Methods: The study is an 8-year retrospective analysis of all gestational glucose challenge and tolerance tests performed at the Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre (SLMHC) laboratory from 1 January, 2010 to 31 December, 2017. Test, gestational timing and completion rate of screening were recorded, and GDM prevalence was calculated on the tested population. Screening completion rates were recorded for the subset of women who delivered at SLMHC from 2014 to 2017. Results: The average annual GDM prevalence was 12%, double the Ontario rate. Over the 8-year period, 513 patients were diagnosed with GDM among the 4298 patients screened. Patients were screened with the 2-step (90%) or the 1-step (10%) protocol. Screening occurred <20 weeks in 3%; 54% occurred in <28 weeks and 40% >28 weeks. Seventy percent of the tests were from remote nursing stations. The screening completion rate for women delivering at SLMHC in 2017 was 80.8%. Conclusion: The prevalence of GDM in Northwestern Ontario is twice the provincial rate. Most screening used the 2-step protocol; early screening was underused. Improvements in screening programming are underway and future research may match surveillance rates and results to GDM outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_51_19

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In northwestern Ontario, the average annual gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence was 12% (8-17%), two times higher than in all of Ontario.

    “They performed an 8-year retrospective analysis, that found that the average annual GDM prevalence was 12% (8–17%), two times higher than in all of Ontario.”
  • In 90% of cases in northwestern Ontario, a two-step screening protocol was used to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus.

    “In 90% of the cases, they used a two-step screening protocol to diagnose GDM [77].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poirier, J., Kattini, R., Kelly, L., Madden, S., Voth, B., Dooley, J., Marazan, B., & Hummelen, R.
Affiliations
  • Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority (CA)
  • Sioux Lookout Local Education Group, Sioux Lookout, Canada
  • NOSM University (CA)
  • Northwest Health Alliance, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
Corresponding author
Kelly, Len
Venue
Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine
Published
2020-03-28
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
61-66
ISSN
  • 1203-7796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-237X
OpenAlex
W3013076265
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, prenatal screening, glucose challenge test, oral glucose tolerance test, screening completion rates, GDM prevalence, First Nations women, screening timing, northwestern Ontario
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Ontario, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review