Cervical cancer awareness and HPV vaccine acceptability among females in Delhi: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study is to assess the awareness about cervical cancer and the acceptability of cytological screening and vaccine against human papilloma virus (HPV) among women in Delhi, the national capital of India. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey of women was conducted in Delhi to assess the awareness of cervical cancer and acceptability of Papanicolaou (Pap) test and HPV vaccine. The sample size of the population was 450, and a pre-tested questionnaire was administered to them. Results Majority of the participants (85.11%) were aware of cervical cancer and were willing to undergo diagnosis by Pap test (84.6%). As far as vaccination was concerned, 63.14% found the HPV vaccine acceptable for their daughters. However, very few participants were willing to vaccinate themselves against HPV. Conclusion The high awareness among females in Delhi about cervical cancer and acceptability of screening programs, if done free of cost, shows a positive trend. The only inhibition about HPV vaccine was primarily due to concerns about postvaccination complications. However, inclusion of HPV vaccine in Government-sponsored immunization program would go a long way in increasing the acceptability of the vaccine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Northern Indian states with higher religious conservatism exhibited lower HPV vaccine acceptability compared to more urbanized Southern states.
“For instance, Northern states with higher religious conservatism exhibited lower vaccine acceptability compared to more urbanized Southern States14,22.”
From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review
Josten, K., Rose Dhar, R., Reshmi, B., Natti Krishna, V., & Vennila, J. (2026) · The Indian Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.25259/ijmr_1834_2025 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roy, B., Singh, J., Yadav, A., Siddiqui, S., Setia, A., Ramesh, R., & Singh, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Delhi (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Roy, Brototi
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233
- ISSN
- 0019-509X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2937250624
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Indian Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- cervical cancer awareness, Pap smear, cervical cancer screening, human papillomavirus, women's health, vaccine hesitancy, immunization programs, Delhi
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Government Programs, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Nuclear Family, Vaginal Smears, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult, Papanicolaou Test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review