The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Researchers Write their Articles by Artificial Intelligence?
Abstract
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked considerable interest in its potential applications across various domains, including scientific research and academic writing. However, many academicians are apprehensive about it because of ethical issues. This article explores the question of whether researchers can leverage AI to write their articles. By analyzing an existing model of taking assistance from third-party editing services, it is clear that the usage of AI in writing articles may not be considered unethical. However, authors must clearly mention for what purpose the AI was used and must acknowledge the help. Due to ease of accessibility and proven proficiency, researchers who cannot afford third-party writing services can harness the service of large language models like ChatGPT, Google Bard, Microsoft Bing, Perplexity, Claude, etc. and other AI applications for writing their scientific articles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When AI contributions are properly acknowledged and human oversight is maintained, the use of such technology aligns with ethical research practices [3].”
From Responsible Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Research and Writing: Summarizing ICMJE Guideline (2024) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
Thorp, H. H. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7879 · Cited by 1,437
ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks
Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023) · Indian Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_718_23 · Cited by 80
Self-citationScientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch — but is it any good?
Conroy, G. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-02218-z · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bhatia, 2023, ChatGPT for academic writing: A game changer or a disruptive tool?, J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 39, 1, 10.4103/joacp.joacp_84_23 · DOI
- Alkaissi, 2023, Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing, Cureus, 15, e35179
Cited by
Mondal, H., Mondal, S., & Juhi, A. (2024) · Indian Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s43465-024-01258-5 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mondal, H., & Mondal, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Sciences and Clinical Practice
- Published
- 2023-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165-167
- ISSN
- 2772-364X
- 2772-3658
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
