Cited by 3Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Prevalence rates of impaired glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus amongst expectant mothers and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in walk-in patients at health centres in North Central Trinidad

Open access
Khan, Raveed, Bisnath, Jeren, Blackmann, Jhonel, Bissessar, Raqiba, Bidhesi, Sajay, Boodoo, Neila, Bobb, Tricia, Benjamin, Jodi +2 more·2020·Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

Abstract

Objective: To assess the prevalence rates of impaired glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes among expectant mothers, as well as the prevalence rate of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in walk-in patients at selected health centres in North Central Trinidad. Design: A cross-sectional study over the period January 2012 to December 2016. Setting: Primary health care centres. Sample Population: Pregnant women aged 18–45 years who were within their second and third trimester of pregnancy, and for undiagnosed diabetes mellitus the sample population consisted of males and females over the age of 18. Methodology: Medical records of 90 pregnant women and 174 walk-in patients who received care at the selected health centres during the period January 2012 to December 2016 were examined and the following were recorded: age, ethnicity, parity, gravidity, past medical/surgical history, past obstetric history, oral glucose tolerance test results, random blood glucose results, HbA1c results, and family history of diabetes mellitus (DM). Results: The sample population was 90 expectant mothers and 174 walk-in patients. However, valid results were available for 50 expectant mothers and 78 walk-in patients. Of the 50 valid results for expectant mothers, 1 mother had a confirmed diagnosis recorded for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) yielding a prevalence of 2% for GDM. Age was positively correlated with the diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). (P = 0.028). Of the 141 valid entries for walk-in patients, 25 had a confirmed diagnosis of DM yielding a prevalence of ~ 18% for undiagnosed DM. A family history of diabetes was positively correlated with a subsequent diagnosis of DM among previously undiagnosed diabetes. Conclusion: The prevalence rate for GDM was found to be 2% and the prevalence rate for undiagnosed DM in walk-in patients was 18%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_124_20

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The national prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Trinidad and Tobago was estimated at 14.5% using IADPSG/WHO 2013 criteria.

    “The national prevalence in Trinidad and Tobago was estimated at 14.5% using the IADPSG/WHO 2013 criteria [97].”

    From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Discussion mentions a national prevalence of 14.5% alongside its GDM findings, but later identifies 14.5% as an International Diabetes Federation estimate for diabetes mellitus, not a national GDM estimate. The Methodology refers to WHO criteria for the study’s local GDM diagnoses; it does not say the 14.5% estimate used IADPSG/WHO 2013 criteria. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A cross-sectional study from north central Trinidad estimated the gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence at 2%, but the authors mentioned the real prevalence might be higher.

    “In contrast, a cross-sectional study from north central Trinidad, which lasted from January 2012 to December 2016 estimated the prevalence of GDM at 2%, but the authors mentioned that the real prevalence might be higher and further investigations were needed [97].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [3]International Diabetes Federation IDF Diabetes Atlas 2019 9th ed Brussels, Belgium International Diabetes Federation 35914061
  2. [4]Clapperton M Jarvis J Mungrue K Is gestational diabetes mellitus an important contributor to metabolic disorders in Trinidad and Tobago? Obstet Gynecol Int 2009 2009 289329 19946648 PMC2778874
  3. [8]World Health Organization Diagnostic Criteria and Classification of Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy 2013 WHO Available from: http://appswhoint/iris/bitstream/10665/85975/1/WHO_NMH_MND_132_engpdf 24199271
  4. [11]Bener A Saleh NM Al-Hamaq A Prevalence of gestational diabetes and associated maternal and neonatal complications in a fast-developing community: Global comparisons 2011 3 367 73 PMC3225465 22140323
  5. [12]Dabelea D Snell-Bergeon JK Hartsfield CL Bischoff KJ Hamman RF McDuffie RS Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort Diabetes Care 2005 28 579 84 15735191
  6. [13]Claypool KT Chung MK Deonarine A Gregg EW Patel CJ Characteristics of undiagnosed diabetes in men and women under the age of 50 years in the Indian subcontinent: The national family health survey (NFHS-4)/Demographic health survey 2015-2016 BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020 8 e000965doi: 101136/bmjdrc-2019-000965 PMC7206915 32098896
  7. [15]Charan J Biswas T How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medicalresearch? Indian J Psychol Med 2013 35 121 6 24049221 PMC3775042
  8. [16]Guariguata L Linnenkamp U Beagley J Whiting DR Cho NH Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy DiabetesRes Clin Pract 2014 103 176 85 24300020
  9. [18]Metzger BE Buchanan TA Coustan DR de Leiva A Dunger DB Hadden DR Summary and Recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care 2007 30 Suppl 2 S251 60 17596481
  10. [20]Wild S Roglic G Green A Sicree R King H Global prevalence of diabetes. Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030 Diabetes Care 2004 27 1047 53 15111519

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, R., Bisnath, J., Blackmann, J., Bissessar, R., Bidhesi, S., Boodoo, N., Bobb, T., Benjamin, J., Mohammed, A., & Mahabir, A.
Affiliations
University of the West Indies (TT)
Corresponding author
Khan, Raveed
Venue
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Published
2020
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
3112
ISSN
2249-4863 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038487543
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
impaired glucose tolerance, gestational diabetes mellitus, undiagnosed diabetes, prevalence, pregnant women, oral glucose tolerance test, HbA1c, family history of diabetes, age as risk factor, primary care, Trinidad

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review