Cited by 11Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Knowledge and attitude of adolescent girls and their mothers regarding cervical cancer: A community-based cross-sectional study

Open access
Ahlawat, Pooja, Batra, Nitya, Sharma, Pragya, Kumar, Shiv, Kumar, Ajay·2018·Journal of Mid-life Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in India. The mother's awareness about the symptoms and risk factors has a large impact on the daughter's knowledge and attitude. Mother and adolescent daughter duos were selected as the sample as they are the target population at risk for suffering from carcinoma cervix. Mothers are the prime information providers and in an excellent position to aware their adolescent daughters about cervical cancer. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine knowledge and attitude of adolescent girls and their mothers regarding cervical cancer and to find the association between the education of the mothers and their knowledge about risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 duos of adolescent daughters along with their mothers residing in Balmiki Basti (Delhi), using a predesigned, pretested, semi-structured interview schedule. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS-22 version. RESULTS: < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Study revealed a low-level knowledge about cervical cancer among adolescent daughters and their mothers. Therefore, there is an urgent need to empower the women by educating them on this issue. Furthermore, there is a need to encourage the mothers to communicate the right information to their adolescent daughters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/jmh.jmh_45_18

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Targeted educational programs demonstrated significant gains in vaccine intent and knowledge.

    “Targeted educational programs demonstrated significant gains in vaccine intent and knowledge38,43.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results (page unavailable) report a statistically significant association between mothers’ educational attainment and knowledge of cervical-cancer risk factors. The Methods mention a health education package, but the paper does not report measured gains after that program or gains in vaccine intent. Thus, the significant knowledge finding offers only partial support for the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite educational interventions, a subset of participants remained hesitant, often citing concerns about vaccine cost, availability, or insufficient information from healthcare providers.

    “Despite this, a subset of participants remained hesitant, often citing concerns about vaccine cost, availability, or insufficient information from healthcare providers31,32,38,43.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Ethical considerations section (page unavailable) says participants received a health education package, but reports no post-intervention vaccine hesitancy. The Results and Discussion passages (page unavailable) address cervical-cancer knowledge, not concerns about vaccine cost, availability, or information from healthcare providers. Searches for those barriers and for vaccination attitudes after the intervention found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [2]Burd EM Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer Clin Microbiol Rev 2003 16 1 7 12525422 PMC145302
  2. [3]Morales-Campos DY Markham CM Peskin MF Fernandez ME Hispanic mothers' and high school girls' perceptions of cervical cancer, human papilloma virus, and the human papilloma virus vaccine J Adolesc Health 2013 52 S69 75 23601613
  3. [4]Das S Patro KC Cancer care in the rural areas of India: A firsthand experience of a clinical oncologist and review of literatures J Cancer Res Ther 2010 6 299 303 21119257
  4. [5]Kaarthigeyan K Cervical cancer in India and HPV vaccination Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2012 33 7 12 22754202 PMC3385284
  5. [6]Bansal AB Pakhare AP Kapoor N Mehrotra R Kokane AM Knowledge, attitude, and practices related to cervical cancer among adult women: A hospital-based cross-sectional study J Nat Sci Biol Med 2015 6 324 8 26283822 PMC4518402
  6. [7]Tran NT Choe SI Taylor R Ko WS Pyo HS So HC Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) concerning cervical cancer and screening among rural and urban women in six provinces of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011 12 3029 33 22393985
  7. [9]Lee A Ho M Cheung CK Keung VM Factors influencing adolescent girls' decision in initiation for human papillomavirus vaccination: A cross-sectional study in Hong Kong BMC Public Health 2014 14 925 25195604 PMC4176578
  8. [12]Harsha Kumar H Tanya S A study on knowledge and screening for cervical cancer among women in Mangalore city Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014 4 751 6 25328788 PMC4199169
  9. [13]Mukama T Ndejjo R Musabyimana A Halage AA Musoke D Women's knowledge and attitudes towards cervical cancer prevention: A cross sectional study in Eastern Uganda BMC Womens Health 2017 17 9 28137260 PMC5282746

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahlawat, P., Batra, N., Sharma, P., Kumar, S., & Kumar, A.
Affiliations
  • Indian Council of Medical Research (IN)
  • Maulana Azad Medical College (IN)
Corresponding author
Ahlawat, Pooja
Venue
Journal of Mid-life Health
Published
2018
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
145
ISSN
0976-7800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891711039
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Mid-life Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
cervical cancer, adolescent girls, maternal knowledge, health knowledge and attitudes, cervical cancer risk factors, maternal education, health communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review