Bridging the Gap: The Critical Role of Collaboration Between Dentistry and Pharmacy
Open accessAbstract
In modern health care, the synergy between dentistry and pharmacy is more crucial than ever. With increase in emphasis on holistic patient care, collaboration between these two fields has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes, minimize adverse drug reactions, and enhance overall healthcare delivery. However, despite their interdependence, the communication gap between dental and pharmacy professionals remains a persistent challenge. Addressing this divide through education, interdisciplinary collaboration, and technology-driven solutions will not only improve patient safety but also optimize treatment outcomes. Dentists and pharmacists share a common responsibility in ensuring the safe and effective use of medications. While dentists prescribe medications to manage oral infections, pain, and inflammatory conditions, pharmacists provide expertise in drug interactions, side effects, and patient adherence. This dynamic necessitates a seamless exchange of information between both fields to prevent medication errors and improve treatment efficacy. Yet, in many cases, a lack of structured communication channels leads to suboptimal patient care. One major concern in dental practice is antibiotic stewardship. Dentists are among the top prescribers of antibiotics, often for prophylactic and therapeutic purposes. However, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing contributes to antimicrobial resistance, a growing global health threat. Pharmacists play a vital role in monitoring antibiotic prescriptions, advising on appropriate regimens, and educating both patients and prescribers on the risks of overuse. A closer partnership between the two professions can help establish more effective antibiotic stewardship programs, ensuring judicious use of these critical medications. To foster better integration between dentistry and pharmacy, several steps must be taken. Interdisciplinary education should be emphasized in professional training programs, encouraging early exposure to the roles and responsibilities of each field. Additionally, the adoption of shared electronic health records can enhance communication, allowing pharmacists to review dental prescriptions and offer real-time recommendations. Finally, professional organizations should advocate for policies that encourage joint continuing education programs and interprofessional collaborations. The future of patient-centered care lies in breaking down silos between healthcare disciplines. By embracing collaboration, dentistry and pharmacy can enhance patient safety, improve treatment efficacy, and contribute to a more cohesive healthcare system. The time to bridge the gap is now. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dentists may lack access to patients' full medication histories, which can result in missed or underestimated DDIs and increase the risk of DDI-related harm.
“Compounding the challenge, dentists may lack access to patients' full medication histories, which can result in missed or underestimated DDIs and increase the risk of DDI-related harm [23][24][25].”
From Comparing Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek) and Oral Surgeons in Detecting Clinically Relevant Drug–Drug Interactions in Dental Therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
In the main text (page unavailable), the paper describes communication gaps between dentists and pharmacists, pharmacists’ expertise in drug interactions, and the potential to reduce adverse drug reactions. It does not say that dentists lack access to full medication histories or that this causes DDIs to be missed or underestimated. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tayeb, S., Barausse, C., Pellegrino, G., Sansavini, M., Pistilli, R., & Felice, P. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app152312851 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Laddha, R.
- Affiliations
- Department of Periodontics, Dr RR Kambe Dental College, Akola, Maharashtra, India
- Corresponding author
- Laddha, Rashmi
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
- Published
- 2025-04-29
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- Suppl 1
- Pages
- S1-S1
- ISSN
- 0975-7406 (ISSN-L)
- 0976-4879
- PMC
- PMC12156550
- OpenAlex
- W4409993267
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- interprofessional collaboration, dental prescribing, medication errors, adverse drug reactions, antibiotic stewardship, antimicrobial resistance, drug interactions, patient safety, electronic health records, interdisciplinary teaching, interprofessional education, shared electronic health records, continuing education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review