Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 70Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived social support and depression levels of women in the postpartum period in Hatay, Turkey

Open access
Tambag, H, Turan, Z, Tolun, S, Can, R·2018·Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Postpartum depression is one of the major problems affecting the mother and baby's health. Inadequate social support system may affect the occurrence of this problem. This study was performed to determine the depression and social support in women at the postpartum period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a cross-sectional study. The research was conducted in Narlıca No. 2 family health center located in the city center of Hatay with 177 women who have given birth at least 2-4 months before and agreed to participate in the study. Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and Sociodemographic Information Form was utilized for data collection. RESULTS: It was determined that women's scores of EPDS and MSPSS were affected by the variables of intended pregnancy and obtained support for infant care (P < 0.05). A significant negative correlation (P < 0.01) was found between MSPSS and EPDS scales. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that as social support levels increase there is a decrease at postpartum depression risk. It is recommended that planning of interventions should be in accordance with the factors affecting the social support and depression levels at women in the postpartum period.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/njcp.njcp_285_17

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Tambag, H., Turan, Z., Tolun, S., & Can, R.
Affiliations
  • Sakarya University (TR)
  • Mustafa Kemal University (TR)
Venue
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2018
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1525
ISSN
1119-3077 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912425262
Cited by
70
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, perceived social support, postpartum women, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Hatay
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Mothers, Perception, Pregnancy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Social Support, Turkey, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.