The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on general population in West Bengal: A cross-sectional study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic poses a unique medical challenge to the humanity in recent times. The psychological impact of the pandemic itself and the lockdown in particular is likely to be huge. AIM: To assess the psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on general population in West Bengal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was an online survey which was conducted using Google Forms with link sent using WhatsApp. A 38-item self-designed questionnaire was used for the study. The survey questionnaire would take around 5-7 min to complete. Total 507 responses were received by the stipulated time. RESULTS: Near about five-seventh (71.8%) and one-fifth (24.7%) of the respondents felt more worried and depressed, respectively, in the past 2 weeks. Half of the respondents (52.1%) were preoccupied with the idea of contracting COVID-19 and one-fifth (21.1%) of the respondents were repeatedly thinking of getting themselves tested for the presence of COVID-19 despite having no symptoms. Majority (69.6%) of the respondents were worried about the financial loss they were incurring during the period of lockdown. One-fourth (25.6%) and one-third (30.8%) of the respondents found that COVID-19 pandemic had threatened their existence and they found it difficult to adjust to the new routine during 21-day lockdown period, respectively. CONCLUSION: The index survey suggested that worry and sleep disturbances were common among the respondents in the past 2 weeks. The pandemic threatened the existence of the respondents to a great extent and affected their mental status negatively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and anxiety and depression while coping with the 'new normal ' (Cao et al., 2020; Chakraborty and Chatterjee, 2020; Haleem et al., 2020, Huang and Zhao, 2020).”
From Understanding coronaphobia (2020) · cites this paper as Chakraborty and Chatterjee, 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Fear of virus would involve preoccupation with threat provoking cognitions (Chakraborty and Chatterjee, 2020)”
From Understanding coronaphobia (2020) · cites this paper as Chakraborty and Chatterjee, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience
REYNOLDS, D. L., GARAY, J. R., DEAMOND, S. L., MORAN, M. K., GOLD, W., & STYRA, R. (2008) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268807009156 · Cited by 895
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychosocial impact of COVID-19
Dubey, S., Biswas, P., Ghosh, R., Chatterjee, S., Dubey, M. J., Chatterjee, S., Lahiri, D., & Lavie, C. J. (2020) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.035 · Cited by 1,958
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adults: Rapid Review
Lebrasseur, A., Fortin-Bédard, N., Lettre, J., Raymond, É., Bussières, È.-L., Lapierre, N., Faieta, J. M., Vincent, C., Duchesne, L., Ouellet, M., et al. (2021) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/26474 · Cited by 445
Impact of COVID-19 on people with physical disabilities: A rapid review
Lebrasseur, A., Fortin-Bédard, N., Lettre, J., Bussières, È.-L., Best, K. L., Boucher, N., Hotton, M., Beaulieu‐Bonneau, S., Mercier, C., Lamontagne, M., et al. (2020) · Disability and health journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.101014 · Cited by 262
Arora, A., Jha, A. K., Alat, P., & Das, S. S. (2020) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102384 · Cited by 264
“ii Cognitive: Fear of virus would involve preoccupation with threat provoking cognitions (Chakraborty and Chatterjee, 2020), e.”
BackgroundImpact of COVID-19 outbreak on lifestyle behaviour: A review of studies published in India
Rawat, D., Dixit, V., Gulati, S., Gulati, S., & Gulati, A. (2021) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.038 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakraborty, K., & Chatterjee, M.
- Affiliations
- West Bengal University of Health Sciences (IN)
- College of Medicine & JNM Hospital (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Chakraborty, Kaustav
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 266
- ISSN
- 0019-5545 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7368440
- OpenAlex
- W3025331834
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 31
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Indian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, psychological impact, lockdown, anxiety, depression, worry, sleep disorders, fear of infection, financial losses, West Bengal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review