CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Innovations in Medical EducationHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing education and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of integrating a nursing licensure examination preparation course into a nursing program curriculum: A quasi-experimental study

Open access
Almarwani, Abdulaziz Mofdy·2022·Saudi Journal for Health Sciences
DOI 10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_87_22
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Nursing licensure examinations (NLEs) are used worldwide to determine nursing students' levels of competence and preparedness to practice nursing. However, despite students' knowledge of nursing concepts, some students struggle with anxiety, pressure, and NLE question style. Preparation courses embedded within nursing students' curriculum may be effective in preparing students to take the NLE. Aim: The aim is to determine the effectiveness of implementing a Saudi Nursing Licensure Examination (SNLE) preparation course into nursing students' curriculum. Setting and Design: A quasi-experimental, repeated measures design was used with 109 undergraduate nursing students in three-branch college of nursing in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Methods: Students completed a 3-month SNLE preparation course integrated into the current curriculum. The course involved practice question preparation, case studies, and online learning videos. Students took an SNLE-style pretest before the course and a posttest one month after the course was completed. Results: Most students were female (70.6%) and 34.9% reported studying 1–2 h per week studying for the course. There was a significant, positive, and strong correlation between the number of hours spent studying and SNLE posttest scores ( r = 0.729, n = 109, P < 0.001). Students performed significantly better after taking the SNLE preparation course. Female students scored higher in all domains compared to male students, especially within the maternity and pediatric nursing domain. Conclusions: An NLE preparation course integrated into the nursing curriculum was shown to be effective within this sample of Saudi nursing students. Further research with larger samples may be needed to corroborate these findings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_87_22

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Related

Metadata

Authors
Almarwani, A. M.
Corresponding author
Almarwani, Abdulaziz Mofdy
ORCID
Almarwani, Abdulaziz Mofdy
Venue
Saudi Journal for Health Sciences
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2022-09
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
184-189
ISSN
2278-0521 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_87_22
OpenAlex
W4312449817
Cited by
14
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Saudi Journal for Health Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
nursing licensure examination, nursing curriculum integration, undergraduate nursing students, online learning videos, practice questions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review