The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prominent ear correction: three flap technique combined with conventional otoplasty.
Abstract
Background: This article aims to present an alternative technique for elevating distal, proximal, and inferior based perichondrioadipodermal (PAD) flaps along with traditional otoplasty to correct ear lobule protrusion, covering the Mustarde and Furnas sutures, and lowering the potential risk and complications. Materials and Methods: This study included undergoing primary otoplasties and had the prominence of ear lobule protrusion and both ears. It included as many as 61 patients (122 ears) who complained of prominent ear deformity with the protruding earlobe and were operated on between February 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-four patients were male and 27 patients were female. The mean age of patients was 26 (9–39). The perpendicular distance from the mastoid to the helical rim's middle part and the antitragus to the mastoid area were measured at the level of Frankfort's horizontal line preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The value of auricular mastoid distance exceeding 20 mm in all situations preoperatively corresponded to a prominent ear. The distance between the antitragus and the mastoid area higher than 22 mm in any situation corresponded to a prominent lobule preoperatively. Results: The average width measured in the frontal view of the ear lowered from 29 ± 4 mm to 17 ± 3 mm postoperatively at 6 months. The average width measured in the lobules' frontal view postoperatively lowered from 27 ± 5 mm to 16 ± 4 mm at 6 months. A round, natural-looking, and durable shape were accomplished in all patients. No complications pertaining to prominent ear deformity or the lobule's correction were observed. No patient was found to experience suture extrusion, skin necrosis, hematoma, or wound infection either early or later at the postoperative period. Conclusion: This study presented a safe and effective three PAD flap technique combined with traditional otoplasty for addressing prominent ear deformity with protruding ear lobule. The advantages of this technique include round, durable, and natural-looking ear shape as well as a consequent natural-looking earlobe. Level of Evidence: V.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review
Kaleeny, J. D., & Janis, J. E. (2026) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000007404
PETAL – LIKE OTOPLASTY IN THE TREATMENT OF PROTRUDING EARS
Riznyk, A. B. (2024) · Art of Medicine · doi:10.21802/artm.2024.3.31.131
“Лише згодом було встановлено, що ча-стою причиною відстовбурченості вушних раковин є не лише згладжений протизавиток та його верхня ніжка, але і його нижня ніжка, часто в поєднанні з гіпертрофією вушної чаші та деформацією вушної дольки [3, 11].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Duran, A., Cortuk, O., & Eroglu, S.
- ORCID
- Duran, Alpay
- Venue
- Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 55
- ISSN
- 1300-6878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4363609745
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- prominent ears, otoplasty, ear reconstruction, ear deformity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prominent ear correction: three flap technique combined with conventional otoplasty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/tjps.tjps_64_21
- The paper
- Duran, A., Cortuk, O., & Eroglu, S. (2023). Prominent ear correction: three flap technique combined with conventional otoplasty. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjps.tjps_64_21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.