Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prominent ear correction: three flap technique combined with conventional otoplasty.

Duran, Alpay, Cortuk, Oguz, Eroglu, Sinem·2023·Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Background: This article aims to present an alternative technique for elevating distal, proximal, and inferior based perichondrioadipodermal (PAD) flaps along with traditional otoplasty to correct ear lobule protrusion, covering the Mustarde and Furnas sutures, and lowering the potential risk and complications. Materials and Methods: This study included undergoing primary otoplasties and had the prominence of ear lobule protrusion and both ears. It included as many as 61 patients (122 ears) who complained of prominent ear deformity with the protruding earlobe and were operated on between February 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-four patients were male and 27 patients were female. The mean age of patients was 26 (9–39). The perpendicular distance from the mastoid to the helical rim's middle part and the antitragus to the mastoid area were measured at the level of Frankfort's horizontal line preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The value of auricular mastoid distance exceeding 20 mm in all situations preoperatively corresponded to a prominent ear. The distance between the antitragus and the mastoid area higher than 22 mm in any situation corresponded to a prominent lobule preoperatively. Results: The average width measured in the frontal view of the ear lowered from 29 ± 4 mm to 17 ± 3 mm postoperatively at 6 months. The average width measured in the lobules' frontal view postoperatively lowered from 27 ± 5 mm to 16 ± 4 mm at 6 months. A round, natural-looking, and durable shape were accomplished in all patients. No complications pertaining to prominent ear deformity or the lobule's correction were observed. No patient was found to experience suture extrusion, skin necrosis, hematoma, or wound infection either early or later at the postoperative period. Conclusion: This study presented a safe and effective three PAD flap technique combined with traditional otoplasty for addressing prominent ear deformity with protruding ear lobule. The advantages of this technique include round, durable, and natural-looking ear shape as well as a consequent natural-looking earlobe. Level of Evidence: V.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/tjps.tjps_64_21

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Duran, A., Cortuk, O., & Eroglu, S.
Venue
Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery
Published
2023
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
55
ISSN
1300-6878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4363609745
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
prominent ears, otoplasty, ear reconstruction, ear deformity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prominent ear correction: three flap technique combined with conventional otoplasty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/tjps.tjps_64_21
The paper
Duran, A., Cortuk, O., & Eroglu, S. (2023). Prominent ear correction: three flap technique combined with conventional otoplasty. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjps.tjps_64_21

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.