Development and Perceived Usability Evaluation of a Mobile application for Notetaking
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Notetaking is considered, by many educators, as one of the critical actions of learning. There are several note-taking methods and approaches. Based on these methods and approaches, various applications, whether mobile, desktop or -Web-based, were developed.OBJECTIVES: In this paper, a novel note-taking application based on Cornell Technique, is presented. Its development process and user acceptance trend are exhibited and results for user evaluation based on user satisfaction are presented. METHODS: For the software development process, Incremental Model was adopted. Requirement Analysis included, aside from examining principles and related note-taking structure of Cornell Technique, investigating (i) how to perform notetaking as an activity of learning, (ii) its product and (iii) relationship of notes for the purpose of storage. Models containing sub-activities, such as reviewing note have been identified and some were selectively adopted and related functions such as review alert (tickler) and collaboration on notetaking have been implemented. To the purpose of storage, a tree-based scheme called collection was modelled. User interfaces were first designed as mockups and click-through pro-totype using Adobe XD. The mobile application was implemented in Dart programming language. Google’s Firebase Service and Flutter Framework was adopted. The mobile application was compared with its equivalents in the Google Play Store and user statistics were investigated. To evaluate perceived usability, the System Usability Scale is adopted and applied to 14 university students conforming to determined persona.RESULTS: The application has been published in Google Play Store for users to install for free on 18th March 2022. As of 10th September 2023, total number of downloads is 5K and the Cornell Note mobile app is currently installed on 1108 devices. For the last three-month period (from 11th June to 10th September 2023), the active users per month changed in an increasing trend from 450 to 589. The average engagement time on 11th of April 2023 was 28 minutes 00 seconds. As the number of monthly active users increased, the average engagement time measured on 10th September 2023 decreased to 23 minutes 31 seconds. However, engagement rates measured were 76.91% and 77.19%, respectively. The mean SUS score was found to be equal to 79.5.CONCLUSION: The user statistics and comparison with equivalent mobile applications reveal that Cornell Note has potential to grow as a mobile application for notetaking since it has a good perceived usability, however, there is room for improvement. Considering any extra marketing effort was not spent for the application such as application store optimization, the statistics are another evidence for user appeal and acceptance. However, it is important to add new functionality without complicating the user experience so that user appeal and acceptance boosts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SUS mean score exceeded the 70-point acceptability threshold.
“exceeding the 70-point acceptability threshold (Demirelli et al., 2023; Takano et al., 2023)”
From SiKurang: Development and Field Evaluation of an Offline-First mHealth System for Community-Based Stunting Risk Detection and Counselling in Low-Connectivity Primary Care Settings (2026) · cites this paper as Demirelli et al., 2023
Cites
On the dimensionality of the System Usability Scale: a test of alternative measurement models
Borsci, S., Federici, S., & Lauriola, M. (2009) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0268-9 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Istambul, M. R., Parlindungan, P., Henry Wijaya, J., Zezarina, R., & Fachrizsal, D. (2026) · Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia · doi:10.59784/glosains.v7i2.670
“The System Usability Scale yielded a mean score of 84.2 (SD 6.1), exceeding the 70-point acceptability threshold (Demirelli et al., 2023; Takano et al., 2023).”
Influential
- Authors
- Demirelli, H., Isler, Y., & Yuce, Y. K.
- Affiliations
- Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi (TR)
- Venue
- EAI Endorsed Transactions on e-Learning
- Published
- 2023-12-05
- Volume
- 9
- ISSN
- 2032-9253 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389347728
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- ICST Transactions on e-Education and e-Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Keywords
- note-taking, mobile application, usability evaluation, System Usability Scale, user satisfaction, user engagement, DART, flutter, Firebase, university students, learning tools, app store analytics, user acceptance, incremental model, user interface design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review