The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discourse Analysis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is because qualitative research often involves smaller, homogeneous groups or explores speci fi c issues with fi ndings relevant to the selected participants in a particular context (Coyle, 2021).”
From Quality Criteria: General and Specific Guidelines for Qualitative Approaches in Psychology Research. A Concise Guide for Novice Researchers and Reviewers (2024) · cites this paper as Coyle, 2021
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cena, E., Brooks, J., Day, W., Goodman, S., Rousaki, A., Ruby-Granger, V., & Seymour-Smith, S. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241282843 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Coyle, A.
- Corresponding author
- Coyle, Adrian
- ORCID
- Coyle, Adrian
- Venue
- Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2021
- OpenAlex
- W7165745242
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
- Keywords
- discourse analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discourse Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781036232078.n17
- The paper
- Coyle, A. (2021). Discourse Analysis. Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232078.n17
