The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These linguistic absences are meaningful only when they are analysed in tandem with the presence and frequency of linguistic items through a dialogical process of comparison and juxtaposition of 'the presence, absence or frequency of an item in one data set' (Mautner 2016, 175).”
From Accessibility and universal design in higher education curricula: implications for inclusion/exclusion (2025) · cites this paper as Mautner 2016, 175
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mavrou, K., Theodorou, E., Mouka, M., & Liasidou, A. (2025) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2025.2507244 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Mautner, G.
- Corresponding author
- Mautner, Gerlinde
- ORCID
- Mautner, Gerlinde
- Venue
- Methods of Critical Discourse Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2016
- OpenAlex
- W7125614949
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 14.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- WU Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › linguistics and terminology studies
- Keywords
- corpus linguistics, critical discourse analysis, interdisciplinary integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781036235192.n7
- The paper
- Mautner, G. (2016). Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036235192.n7
