The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach
Abstract
Preface to the Fourth Edition Acknowledgments About the Author Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter 2. Step 1: Formulating the Problem Chapter 3. Step 2: Searching the Literature Chapter 4. Step 3: Gathering Information From Studies Chapter 5. Step 4: Evaluating the Quality of Studies Chapter 6. Step 5: Analyzing and Integrating the Outcomes of Studies Chapter 7. Step 6: Interpreting the Evidence Chapter 8. Step 7: Presenting the Results Chapter 9. Conclusion: Threats to the Validity of Research Synthesis Conclusions References Author Index Subject Index
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Researchers conducting evidence synthesis must transform narrative study reports into tabular records before quantitative integration can begin [1,2].”
From Diagnosing the limits of large language models for structured scientific evidence extraction (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“To ensure coding reliability and to mitigate inconsistencies in the data extraction223, 30 articles were randomly selected and independently coded by author D.F. Any inconsistencies were discussed to reach consensus, also drawing on a third author (U.S.T.), if needed.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [223]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The New Statistics: Why and How
Cumming, G. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613504966 · Cited by 3,200
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803 · Cited by 2,550
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1378 · Cited by 2,379
Hall, W. J., Chapman, M. V., Lee, K. M., Merino, Y. M., Thomas, T. W., Payne, B. K., Eng, E., Day, S. H., & Coyne-Beasley, T. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302903 · Cited by 2,176
Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research
Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A. W., & Chaves, W. A. (2017) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842 · Cited by 1,615
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, H.
- Corresponding author
- Cooper, Harris
- ORCID
- Cooper, Harris
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W1420162645
- Cited by
- 1,716
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 176 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 154 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 81
- FWCI
- 57.19
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Diverse Academic Research Areas
- Keywords
- evidence synthesis, meta-analysis, literature searching, study quality assessment, evidence integration, threats to validity, research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
