Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Abstract
ACT is an example of a third wave behavior therapy that saves direct change strategies for overt behaviors and utilizes contextual and experiential methods such as mindfulness and acceptance to address cognitive process that hinder and limit overt behavioral change. The treatment is informed by RFT and is based on the philosophical position of functional contextualism. ACT seeks to undermine the literal grip of language (relational framing) that fosters experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, and behavioral inflexibility, through the application of six core psychological techniques: acceptance, defusion, contact with the present moment, self-as as-context, values, and commitment to behavior change. Homework can play an integral role in the application of these techniques, by supporting the in-session therapy. Homework can be especially useful because it allows the client to utilize these principles in situations that cannot be created in the therapy sessions, such as public situation for someone who struggles with anxiety. As with most therapies, ACT has its own homework assignments, but therapists often create new techniques to serve the clients needs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Discoverer-Noticer-Advisor-values model (DNA-V) uses ACT principles derived from mindfulness and acceptance practices to promote the wellbeing of young people.
“The Discoverer-Noticer-Advisor-values model (DNA-V) uses ACT principles which are derived from mindfulness and acceptance practices to promote the wellbeing of young people [22,29].”
From Effectiveness of a mindfulness and acceptance-based intervention for improving the mental health of adolescents with HIV in Uganda: An open-label trial (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 68 · Cited by 279
- Authors
- Hayes, S. C., & Sackett, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Brown University (US)
- ORCID
- Hayes, Steven C.
- Venue
- Encyclopedia of Behavior Modification and Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Volume 1: Adult Clinical Applications Volume 2: Child Clinical Applications Volume 3: Educational Applications
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2014-10-27
- OpenAlex
- W2018783775
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Encyclopedia of Behavior Modification and Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Volume 1: Adult Clinical Applications Volume 2: Child Clinical Applications Volume 3: Educational Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, third-wave behavior therapy, relational frame theory, functional contextualism, experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, defusion, acceptance, mindfulness, homework, anxiety, behavioral inflexibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review