Theoretical Approaches to the Study of Cognitive Aging: An Individual-Differences Perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nearly all cognitive tasks combine basic mechanisms, knowledge structures, and procedures or algorithms.
“virtually all cognitive tasks (including tests of fluid intelligence) involve mixtures of basic cognitive mechanisms (processes) operating on relevant information structures (knowledge) using relevant procedures or algorithms”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Hertzog, 2008
Habitual use of a well-learned, nominally effective strategy can create problems for adaptive functioning by making one fail to shift to a new, more effective strategy later.
“The inertia of maintaining a well-learned and nominally effective strategy at one point in the life course puts one at risk for failing to adaptively shift to a new and more effective strategy at a later point in time (Hertzog, 2008).”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Hertzog, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hertzog, C.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hertzog, Christopher
- ORCID
- Hertzog, Christopher
- Venue
- Handbook of Cognitive Aging: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 34-49
- OpenAlex
- W2485777764
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- cognitive aging, individual differences, theoretical approaches, cognitive decline, age differences in cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
