The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doing Critical Ethnography
Abstract
Resisting Domestication Beginning to Think Critically Implementing Critical Ethnography Empirical Application Conclusion Tricks, Traps, and Moving Beyond
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015) · The Handbook of Discourse Analysis · doi:10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 · Cited by 5,485
Rose, J., & Johnson, C. W. (2020) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.2020.1722042 · Cited by 419
Enterprise Discourse, Professional Identity and the Organizational Control of Hospital Clinicians
Doolin, B. (2002) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840602233003 · Cited by 359
Van Dijk, T. A. (2016) · Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales · doi:10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2016.n30-10 · Cited by 224
Talk the talk, walk the walk: defining Critical Race Theory in research
Hylton, K. (2012) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.638862 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, J.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1993
- OpenAlex
- W597999034
- Cited by
- 1,260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing Critical Ethnography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781412983945
- The paper
- Thomas, J. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983945
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
