The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ethnographic Decision Tree Modeling
Abstract
Why Model How People Make Decisions How to Model Simple `Do It Don't Do It' Decisions How to Test Decision Models How Not to Do It Common Problems How to Build Multi-Stage Models What's the Payoff
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The interview protocols for the initial interview and reflection interview were structured using an ethnographic decision tree modeling approach (Gladwin, 1989).”
From Promising directions for human-robot interactions defined by older adults (2024) · cites this paper as Gladwin, 1989
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goodrick, D., & Rogers, P. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119171386.ch22 · Cited by 1,493
An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research
Stacks, D. W. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203887011 · Cited by 1,014
Case study research methods for theory building
Woodside, A. G., & Wilson, E. J. (2003) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/08858620310492374 · Cited by 551
Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies
Jonsen, K., & Jehn, K. A. (2009) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465640910978391 · Cited by 639
Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria:Farmer types and their rationale
Ika Darnhofer, A., Schneeberger, W., & Freyer, B. (2005) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-004-7229-9 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Gladwin, C. H.
- Corresponding author
- Gladwin, Christina H.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1989
- OpenAlex
- W200776159
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Keywords
- decision tree modeling, ethnography, human decision-making, model testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
