Cited by 664Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412985017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 653

Metadata

Authors
Paterson, B., Thorne, S., Canam, C., & Jillings, C.
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
2001
OpenAlex
W2485332637
Cited by
664
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 27
FWCI
20.80
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
meta-study, qualitative health research, qualitative evidence synthesis, evidence synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review