The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Q Methodology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stirling, A. (2008) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907311265 · Cited by 1,567
Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640560701402075 · Cited by 448
Corporate culture and organizational performance
Kim Jean Lee, S., & Yu, K. (2004) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940410537927 · Cited by 405
Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient
Wu, S. J., Melnyk, S. A., & Flynn, B. B. (2010) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00294.x · Cited by 263
VALIDATING THE COMPETING VALUES MODEL AS A REPRESENTATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES
Howard, L. W. (1998) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028886 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- McKeown, B., & Thomas, D.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1988
- OpenAlex
- W4232185373
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Q Methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781412985512
- The paper
- McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q Methodology. Sage eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
