The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identities in Talk
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Contrasting reflective approaches to identity, discursive approaches consider identities as”
From Studying Identity Development in Everyday Conversations: A Practical Guide to Developmental Discursive Micro-Analysis (DDMA) (2026) · cites this paper as Antaki & Widdicombe, 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction
STOKOE, E. H., & SMITHSON, J. (2001) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926501012002005 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S.
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2008
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
