CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 138Gender and Feminist StudiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender, Sexuality, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rethinking Sexuality

Richardson, Diane·2000·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
DOI 10.4135/9781446219966
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This volume provides a contribution to the understanding of the contemporary state of sexuality and its political, personal and social implications. It considers the changing attitudes to homosexuality and heterosexuality

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781446219966

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Richardson, D.
Corresponding author
Richardson, Diane
ORCID
Richardson, Diane
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Publisher
SAGE Publications Ltd
Published
2000
DOI
10.4135/9781446219966
OpenAlex
W4256201902
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.50
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
sexuality, homosexuality, heterosexuality, sexual attitudes, sexual politics, personal identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review