The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization
Abstract
Johan Galtung, one of the founders of modern peace studies, provides a wide-ranging panorama of the ideas, theories and assumptions on which the study of peace is based. The book is organized in four parts, each examining the one of the four major theoretical approaches to peace
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By leaving race outside the study of socioterritorial movements there is a risk of reproducing academically the colonial discourse of subaltern denial and embodying new forms of cultural violence against Afro-Latin American groups”
From Maroon Socioterritorial Movements (2022) · cites this paper as Galtung 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A realistic conception of politics: conflict, order and political realism
Burelli, C. (2021) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2019.1604045 · Cited by 24
Maroon Socioterritorial Movements
Guillen, A. L. Z. (2022) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2021.1959293 · Cited by 21
Pallathadka, H., & Roy, P. D. (2025) · Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities · doi:10.55544/ijrah.5.3.8 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Galtung, J.
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 1996
- Cited by
- 1,114
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
