Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The pursuit of quality in grounded theory
Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357 · Cited by 1,221 · see citing works
“Unlike earlier manuals describing how to do grounded theory, contemporary versions of the method including Bryant (2017, 2019), Charmaz (2006, 2014), Corbin and Strauss (2008, 2015), and Thornberg and Charmaz (2014) take a flexible approach to grounded theory and adopt more recent epistemologies.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationA Case Study Investigating the Utilization of ChatGPT in Online Discussions
Lin, X., Luterbach, K., Gregory, K. H., & Sconyers, S. E. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i2.4407 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Finally, the themes were refined in the final round, ensuring the production of robust and compelling results for the study (Thornberg & Charmaz, 2014; Yin, 2014).”
BackgroundA systematic review of grounded theory studies in physiotherapy
Ali, N., May, S., & Grafton, K. (2019) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2018.1474403 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K.
- Venue
- The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 153-169
- OpenAlex
- W2495048003
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 35.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Keywords
- grounded theory, qualitative data analysis, theory development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
