The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Controversy over Domestic Violence by Women: A Methodological, Theoretical, and Sociology of Science Analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review
Archer, J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651 · Cited by 2,507
A Short Form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and Typologies for Severity and Mutuality
Straus, M. A., & Douglas, E. M. (2004) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/088667004780927800 · Cited by 891
Self-citationKelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008) · Family Court Review · doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x · Cited by 801
“Gender Symmetry” in Domestic Violence: A Substantive and Methodological Research Review
Kimmel, M. S. (2002) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/107780102237407 · Cited by 667
Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?
Archer, J. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09990951 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Straus, M. A.
- Venue
- Violence in Intimate Relationships
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 17-44
- OpenAlex
- W2481511397
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.43
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Controversy over Domestic Violence by Women: A Methodological, Theoretical, and Sociology of Science Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781452204659.n2
- The paper
- Straus, M. A. (1999). The Controversy over Domestic Violence by Women: A Methodological, Theoretical, and Sociology of Science Analysis. Violence in Intimate Relationships. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452204659.n2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
