The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inoculation Theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“traditional inoculation research has focused on building resilience against specific persuasive attacks (15).”
From Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Psychological inoculation treatments contain two core components (15): (i) a forewarning that induces a perceived threat of an impending attack on one’s attitudes and (ii) exposure to a weakened (micro)dose of misinformation that contains a preemptive refutation (or prebunk) of the anticipated misleading arguments or persuasion techniques.”
From Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–104 of 104
Bucher, H.-J., Boy, B., & Mayer, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-47239-9_35-1
de Paula, C. P. A., Valle, F., & Salomão, A. (2025) · Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação · doi:10.59289/vpf4ss73
Empathetic AI: Credibility Perceptions, Anthropomorphism, and Vaccine Misperceptions
Borah, P., Cao, X., Zhang, Z., & Lee, D. K. L. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2727254
Cognitive Immunity in Cybersecurity: Using Inoculation Theory to Build Resilient Human Firewalls
Toure, A. H. (2026) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27214-0_14
Metadata
- Authors
- Compton, J.
- Corresponding author
- Compton, Josh
- ORCID
- Compton, Josh
- Venue
- The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 220-236
- OpenAlex
- W4240760016
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
- Keywords
- inoculation theory, resistance to persuasion, counterargument, attitude change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
