The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effective Health Risk Messages: A Step-by-Step Guide
Abstract
1. What Are Health Risk Messages? Health Risk Messages Defined What's a Theory? The Components of a Fear Appeal Explicit versus Implicit Messages The Use of Culturally Based Colloquialisms Types of Threats Summary 2. History of Health Risk Messages: Fear Appeal Theories from 1953 to 1991 Fear-as-Acquired Drive Model The Parallel Process Model Protection Motivation Theory Summary Definitions 3. Putting It All Together The Overall Model The Depiction of the Model Comparisons with Other Models Research on the EPPM 4. Useful Concepts from Other Theories The Health Belief Model The Theory of Reasoned Action Social-Cognitive Theory Elaboration Likelihood Model Stages of Change Model Social Marketing Summary 5. Starting Out the Right Way: Formative Research Setting Goals and Objectives: The Campaign Plan Formative Research The Persuasive Health Message (PHM) Framework Putting Transients and Constants Together Gathering Information for the Persuasive Health Message Framework Categorizing Audience Beliefs: A Chart to Guide Message Development Conclusion 6. The Risk Behavior Diagnosis Scale The Origin of the RBD Scale Theoretical Basis for Expanding the EPPM The RBD Scale Tailored Health Risk Messages Some Additional Guidelines Conclusion 7. Out of the Tower and Into the Field Using the RBD at a Campus Health Clinic: Background Conclusion 8. Data Collection Types of Evaluation Gathering Data for the Evaluation Data Collection Methods Reliability and Validity Sample Size Summary 9. Data Analysis Analyzing Data Conclusion 10. Getting the Message Out A Plan of Action Message of Dissemination Issues Specific Channels Summary Conclusion Appendix Glossary Worksheets References Suggested Readings Index About the Authors
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Extended Parallel Process Model: Illuminating the Gaps in Research
Popova, L. (2012) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198111418108 · Cited by 361
How fear-arousing news messages affect risk perceptions and intention to talk about risk
Paek, H.-J., Oh, S.-H., & Hove, T. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1037419 · Cited by 115
Communicating crisis uncertainty: A review of the knowledge gaps
Liu, B. F., Bartz, L., & Duke, N. (2016) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.003 · Cited by 115
Moore, M. J., Soderquist, J., & Werch, C. (2005) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.3200/jach.54.1.38-44 · Cited by 87
Zhu, X., Kim, Y., & Park, H. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.006 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Witte, K., Meyer, G., & Martell, D.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2001
- OpenAlex
- W106440455
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective Health Risk Messages: A Step-by-Step Guide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781452233239
- The paper
- Witte, K., Meyer, G., & Martell, D. (2001). Effective Health Risk Messages: A Step-by-Step Guide. Sage eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.