Cited by 610scientometrics and bibliometrics researchResearch, Science, and AcademiaWeb visibility and informetrics

The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management

Wilsdon, James·2015·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks

Abstract

Metrics evoke a mixed reaction from the research community. A commitment to using data and evidence to inform decisions makes many of us sympathetic, even enthusiastic, about the prospect of granular, real-time analysis of our own activities. Yet we only have to look around us, at the blunt use of metrics to be reminded of the pitfalls. Metrics hold real power: they are constitutive of values, identities and livelihoods. How to exercise that power to positive ends is the focus of this book. Using extensive evidence-gathering, analysis and consultation, the authors take a thorough look at potential uses and limitations of research metrics and indicators. They explore the use of metrics across different disciplines, assess their potential contribution to the development of research excellence and ..

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781473978782

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 610

Authors
Wilsdon, J.
Corresponding author
Wilsdon, James
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Published
2015
OpenAlex
W2588841625
Cited by
610
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.54
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords
research metrics, research evaluation, research management, evidence-based decision making, research excellence, disciplinary differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review