The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Template Analysis for Business and Management Students
Abstract
Part of SAGE’s Mastering Business Research Methods, conceived and edited by Bill Lee, Mark N. K. Saunders and Vadake K. Narayanan and designed to support researchers by providing in-depth and practical guidance on using a chosen method of data collection or analysis. In Template Analysis for Business and Management Students Nigel King and Joanna Brookes guide you through the origins of template analysis and its place in qualitative research, its basic components, and the main strengths and limitations of this method. Practical case studies and examples from published research then guide you through how to use it in your own research project. Ideal for Business and Management students reading for a Master’s degree, each book in the series may also serve as a reference book for doctoral students and faculty members interested in the method. Watch the editors introduce the Mastering Business Research Methods series and tell you more about the first three books.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Template analysis as a method of qualitative data analysis is philosophically flexible, but has been employed in this study using a critical perspective ([29]; p.15), whereby we argue “realities which exist independent of human activity””
From Preliminary findings on the experiences of care for parents who suffered perinatal bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“The iterative approach to coding and quotation selection meant, when saturation of data and themes had been reached, transcripts could be compared to ensure the most illustrative quotations were selected and presented in the results section which follows [29].”
From Preliminary findings on the experiences of care for parents who suffered perinatal bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019) · Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806 · Cited by 19,677
“However, when presenting this Big Q/organic and small q/coding reliability TA typology, we were often asked about where approaches like framework analysis (e.g. Ritchie and Spencer 1994) and template analysis (e.g. King and Brooks 2017b) would fi t.”
MethodA worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis
Byrne, D. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y · Cited by 5,355
“Codebook approaches, such as framework analysis (Smith and Firth 2011) or template analysis (King and Brooks 2017), can be understood to be something of a midpoint between coding reliability approaches and the reflexive approach.”
Boundary conditions for traceability in food supply chains using blockchain technology
Behnke, K., & Janssen, M. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.025 · Cited by 749
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2022) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765 · Cited by 811
“More recently we’ve come to understand that there are various ‘codebook’ approaches – like template (King and Brooks 2017) and framework (Ritchie and Spencer 1994) analysis.”
BackgroundJob quality, fair work and gig work: the lived experience of gig workers
Myhill, K., Richards, J., & Sang, K. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1867612 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- King, N., & Brooks, J. M.
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W2590250792
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 27.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Business and Management Studies
- Keywords
- template analysis, qualitative data analysis, qualitative research, business research methods, management research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
