Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several scholars published reviews documenting their support for continued inclusion of NPD in the DSM.
“Notably, in the buildup to the release of DSM-5, several scholars published reviews of the state of the literature on narcissism and NPD and documented their support for its continued inclusion in the DSM (e.g., Levy et al. 2007;Pincus & Lukowitsky 2010;Ronningstam 2009Ronningstam , 2011)).”
From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Levy et al. 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Levy, K. N., Reynoso, J. S., Wasserman, R. H., & Clarkin, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- City College of New York (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Personality Disorders: Toward the DSM-V
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 233-278
- OpenAlex
- W2491047274
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 16.78
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- narcissistic personality disorder, personality disorders, narcissism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
