The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity
Abstract
How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity Learning Objectives Overview of Psychometrics Reliability Validity Scaling and Scoring Creating and Using a Codebook Pilot Testing Multicultural Issues
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Missing Clinical Information During Primary Care Visits
Smith, P. C. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.5.565 · Cited by 358
Byrd, D. R., & McKinney, K. J. (2012) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2011.584334 · Cited by 315
Hellstrom, W. J. G., Feldman, R., Rosen, R. C., Smith, T., Kaufman, G., & Tursi, J. (2013) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.090 · Cited by 210
The intersectional privilege of white able-bodied heterosexual men in STEM
Cech, E. A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo1558 · Cited by 159
An Empirical Study of Model-Agnostic Techniques for Defect Prediction Models
Jiarpakdee, J., Tantithamthavorn, C. K., Dam, H. K., & Grundy, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.2982385 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Litwin, M.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1995
- OpenAlex
- W325563152
- Cited by
- 1,459
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.71
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781483348957
- The paper
- Litwin, M. (1995). How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity. Sage eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348957
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
