Cited by 180Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchComputational and Text Analysis Methods

Thematic Analysis in Organisational Research

King, Nigel, Brooks, Joanna·2018·The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: Methods and Challenges

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781526430236.n14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Codebook approaches to TA combine structured procedures of coding reliability TA with qualitative research values of reflexive TA.

    “Codebook approaches to TA-such as framework (Gale et al., 2013) or template (King & Brooks, 2018) analysis-combine some of the more structured procedures of coding reliability TA 3 with some of the qualitative research values of reflexive TA.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, N., & Brooks, J.
Venue
The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: Methods and Challenges
Published
2018
Pages
219-236
OpenAlex
W2948250772
Cited by
180
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
62.58
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
thematic analysis, qualitative data analysis, organisational research, coding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review