The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Literature Review in Grounded Theory
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of existing literature is a crucial aspect in Grounded Theory methodology.
“The use of existing literature is a crucial aspect in Grounded Theory methodology (Dunne, 2011; Tarozzi, 2020; Thornberg and Dunne, 2019).”
From Application and challenges of using a Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology to address an undertheorized clinical challenge: A discussion paper (2024) · cites this paper as Thornberg and Dunne, 2019
A well-structured critique of the literature at the beginning of Constructivist Grounded Theory inquiry can empower the researcher, providing the confidence needed to enter the field and commence data collection.
“A well-structured critique of the literature at the beginning of Constructivist Grounded Theory inquiry can empower the researcher (Thornberg and Dunne, 2019), providing the confidence needed to enter the field and commence data collection.”
From Application and challenges of using a Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology to address an undertheorized clinical challenge: A discussion paper (2024) · cites this paper as Thornberg and Dunne, 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Explaining the (non-)adoption of advanced data analytics in auditing: A process theory
Krieger, F., Drews, P., & Velte, P. (2021) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100511 · Cited by 133
Bobbink, P., Larkin, P., & Probst, S. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100199 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Thornberg, R., & Dunne, C.
- Venue
- The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W4247879856
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 26.47
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- grounded theory, qualitative research, evidence synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
