Cited by 372Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Doing Conversation, Discourse and Document Analysis

Open access
Rapley, Tim·2018·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks

Abstract

Studying Discourse Generating an Archive Ethics and Recording 'Data' The Practicalities of Recording Transcribing Audio and Video Materials Exploring Conversations Exploring Conversations about and with Documents Exploring Conversations and Discourse Some Debates and Dilemmas Exploring Documents Studying Discourse Some Closing Comments

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781526441843

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapley, T.
Corresponding author
Rapley, Tim
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Published
2018
OpenAlex
W598782338
Cited by
372
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 18
FWCI
33.60
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
conversation analysis, discourse analysis, document analysis, audiovisual recordings, transcription, research ethics, archives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review