Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,248

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Writing Up Qualitative Research

·2015

Abstract

PART I 1. Introduction Writing Versus Ought-to-be-Writing Looking Ahead Jump Start 2. Getting Going How to Begin Following a Writing Plan When to Begin Where to Begin Analysis and Interpretation The Problem of Focus Problems of Sorting and Organizing Data Recap Putting Ideas to Test 3. Keeping Going Stay With It The Expanding Hanging File Approach Keeping Up the Momentum When It's Time for Details, Get Them Right the First Time Keeping Track of References Keeping Track of Bits and Pieces Getting Feedback Checklist 4. Linking Up The Lit Review Making the Link to Theory Linking Up Through Method Research Techniques in Qualitative Inquiry Finding Ways to Represent Qualitative Approaches Graphically Conceptualizing Qualitative Approaches as a Tree Method, Your (Data Collection) Methods, and Methodology Method or Theory as Narrative Summary Forging Links Applications PART II 5. Tightening Up Reviewing for Content and Style Revising and Editing Honing Your Editorial Skills Formal Editorial Skills How Do You Conclude a Qualitative Study? Alternatives to Concluding a Study Running out of Space Crowding More In Cutting More Out In Short 6. Finishing Up Title The Front Matter The Body of the Text The Back Matter End Game 7. Getting Published Alternative Ways to Get Into Print On Not Getting Published Final Thoughts References and Select Bibliography Name Index Subject Index About the Author/About the Book

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781529622522

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,248

Metadata

Publisher
Leigh Hall
Published
2015
OpenAlex
W1593512270
Cited by
1,248
References
0
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Writing Up Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781529622522
The paper
Writing Up Qualitative Research. (2015). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529622522

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.