Cited by 883Online Learning and AnalyticsDigital Education and SocietyEducational and Technological Research

Big Data in Education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice

Williamson, Ben·2017·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks

Abstract

Big data has the power to transform education and educational research. Governments, researchers and commercial companies are only beginning to understand the potential that big data offers in informing policy ideas, contributing to the development of new educational tools and innovative ways of conducting research. This cutting-edge overview explores the current state-of-play, looking at big data and the related topic of computer code to examine the implications for education and schooling for today and the near future. Key topics include: • The role of learning analytics and educational data science in schools • A critical appreciation of code, algorithms and infrastructures • The rise of 'cognitive classrooms', and the practical application of computational algorithms to learning environments • Important digital research methods issues for researchers This is essential reading for anyone studying or working in today's education environment!

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781529714920

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When embedded in the prompt sequence, ChatGPT generated six references, five of which were hallucinated references, and one genuine reference cited with the correct year.

    “When embedded in the prompt sequence, however, ChatGPT generated six references, five of which were hallucinated references. One, however, was genuine and was cited with the correct year ('Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice' 2027) (Williamson, 2017).”
  • ChatGPT offered to provide a list of actual titles, two of which were genuine [26,27] and three were hallucinated.

    “It offered to provide a list of actual titles, two of which were genuine [26,27] and three were hallucinated.”
  • One of the six references generated by ChatGPT was genuine and was cited with the correct year ('Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice' 2027).

    “One, however, was genuine and was cited with the correct year ('Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice' 2027). [26]”
  • This perspective aligns with sociological analyses of AI in education that emphasize the redistribution of agency and the reconfiguration of pedagogical power.

    “This perspective aligns with sociological analyses of AI in education that emphasize the redistribution of agency and the reconfiguration of pedagogical power [34,41].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williamson, B.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Williamson, Ben
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2999199799
Cited by
883
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 310 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
FWCI
42.47
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational and Technological Research
Keywords
big data in education, learning analytics, educational data science, digital research methods, education policy, schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review