CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Legal and Social Justice StudiesFreedom of Expression and DefamationIntellectual Property Rights and Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Media and Communications Regulation and Child Protection: An Overview of the Field

Open access
Oswell, David·2008·The International Handbook of Children, Media and Culture
DOI 10.4135/9781848608436.n29
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781848608436.n29

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Akdeniz, Y. (1997) 'Governance of pornography and child pornography on the global internet: a multi- layered approach'. In L. Edwards and C. Waelde (eds) Law and the Internet: Regulating Cyberspace. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 223-241.
  2. Azmi, M.I. (2004) 'Content regulation in Malaysia: unleashing missiles on dangerous web sites'. Journal of Information, Law and Technology, (3). www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law2/elj/jilt/2004_3/ azmi/[February 2006].
  3. Barker, M. (1984a) A Haunt of Fears: The Strange History of the British Horror Comics Campaign. London: Pluto Press.
  4. Barker, M. (ed.) (1984b) The Video Nasties: Freedom and Censorship in the Media. London: Pluto Press.
  5. Buckingham, D. (1996) Moving Images: Understand- ing Children's Emotional Reponses to Television. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  6. Campbell, A. (2003) 'Self-regulation and the media: four years later'. Paper presented to the Programme on Comparative Media Law and Policy, Oxford University, 10 March.
  7. Campbell, P. and Machet, E. (1999) 'European policy on regulation of content on the internet'. In J. Liberty (ed.) Liberating Cyberspace: Civil Liberties, Human Rights and the Internet. London: Pluto Press.
  8. Collins, R. and Murroni, C. (1996) New Media, New Policies: Media and Communications Strategies for the Future. Cambridge: Polity Press. Commission of the European Communities (1996a) Communication on the Implications of the Informa- tion Society for European Union Policies -Preparing the Next Steps. Brussels: COM(96) 395; 24 July. Commission of the European Communities (1996b) Green Paper on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity in Audiovisual and Information Services. Brussels: COM(96) 483; 16 October. Commission of the European Communities (1996c) Illegal and Harmful Content on the Internet. Brussels: COM(96)487; 16 October. Commission of the European Communities (1997) Green Paper on the Convergence of the Telecommunica- tions, Media and Information Technology Sectors and the Implications for Regulation: Towards and Infor- mation Society Approach. Brussels: COM(97)623;
  9. December. Cross, G. (1997) Kids' Stuff: Toys and the Chang- ing World of American Childhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. Drotner, K. (1988) English Children and their Magazines, 1751-1945. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  11. Drotner, K. (1992) 'Modernity and media panics' in Skovmand, Michael, and Schröder, Kim (eds.) Media Cultures. Reappraising Transnational Media. London: Routledge. Electronic Frontiers Australia (2006) Internet Censorship in Australia. www.efa.org.au/Issues/Censor/Cens 1. html [February 2006].
  12. Gardener, W. (2003) 'The Sexual Offences Bill: progress and the future'. In Tackling Sexual Grooming Conference, 29 September. www.childnet-int.org/ downloads/online-grooming2.pdf [November 2005].
  13. Goode, E. and Ben-Yehuda, N. (1994) Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Oxford: Blackwell.
  14. ICRA (2005) ICRA Labelling System Specification. Inter- net Content Rating Association. http://www.icra.org/ systemspecification/ [February 2006].
  15. Kapur, J. (1999) 'Out of control: television and the transformation of childhood in late capitalism'. In M. Kinder (ed.) Kids Media Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  16. Kiškis, M. and Petrauskas, R. (2006) 'Internet content regulation: implications for e-government'. Journal of Information, Law and Technology, (2-3). http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2005_ 2-3/kiskis-petrauskas/ [November 2005].
  17. Kunkel, D. and Watkins, B. (1987) 'Evolution of children's television regulatory policy'. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31(4): 367-389.
  18. Loader, B. (1997) 'The governance of cyberspace'. In B. Loader (ed.) The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring. London: Routledge.
  19. Newburn, T. (1992) Permission and Regulation: Law and Morals in Post-War Britain. London: Routledge.
  20. Newey, A. (1999) 'Freedom of expression: censorship in private hands'. In J. Liberty (ed.) Liberating Cyberspace: Civil Liberties, Human Rights and the Internet. London: Pluto Press.
  21. Oswell, D. (1998a) 'Early children's broadcasting in Britain, 1922-1964: programming for a liberal democracy'. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 18(3): 375-393.
  22. Oswell, D. (1998b) 'The Place of "childhood" in internet content regulation: a case study of policy in the UK'. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(2): 271-291.
  23. Oswell, D. (1999) 'The dark side of cyberspace: internet content regulation and child protection'. Convergence, 5(4): 42-62.
  24. Oswell, D. (2002) Television, Childhood and the Home: A History of the Making of the Child Television Audience in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Oswell, D. (2006) 'When images matter: internet child pornography, forms of observation and an ethics of the virtual'. Information, Communication and Society, 9(2): 244-265.
  26. Prosser, T. (2000) 'International lessons on law and regulation'. In T. Lees, S. Ralph and J. Langham Brown (eds) Is Regulation Still and Option in a Digital Universe? Luton: University of Luton Press.
  27. Reidenberg, J. (1996) 'Governing networks and cyberspace rule-making'. Emory Law Journal, 45: 911.
  28. Rowland, W. (1997) 'Television violence redux: the continuing mythology of effects'. In M. Barker, and J. Petley (eds) Ill Effects: The Media/Violence Debate. London: Routledge.
  29. Spigel, L. (1992) Make Room for TV. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  30. Thompson, G. (2003) Between Hierarchies and Markets: The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Wall, D. (2001) 'Cybercrime and the internet'. In D. Wall (ed.) Crime and the Internet. London: Routledge.
  32. Williams, M. (2004) 'Cybercrime'. In J. Mitchell Miller (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Criminology. London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Oswell, D.
Corresponding author
Oswell, David
ORCID
Oswell, David
Venue
The International Handbook of Children, Media and Culture
Publisher
SAGE Publications Ltd
Published
2008
Pages
475-492
DOI
10.4135/9781848608436.n29
OpenAlex
W1873218081
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
23.86
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths Research Online (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
Keywords
media regulation, communications regulation, child protection, child online safety, online content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review