The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doing Conversation Analysis
Abstract
PART ONE: CONSIDERING CA Introducing the CA Paradigm Three Exemplary Studies Ideas and Evidence in CA Research CA and Different Disciplinary Agendas PART TWO: PRODUCING DATA Collecting/Producing Recordings Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction PART THREE: ANALYSING DATA Analytic Strategies Elaborating the Analysis PART FOUR: APPLIED CA Institutional Interaction Local Rationalities, Formal Knowledge and Critical Concerns
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794112446106 · Cited by 1,943
Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction
STOKOE, E. H., & SMITHSON, J. (2001) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926501012002005 · Cited by 214
Social Support and Unsolicited Advice in a Bipolar Disorder Online Forum
Vayreda, A., & Antaki, C. (2009) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732309338952 · Cited by 160
Seuren, L. M., Wherton, J., Greenhalgh, T., Cameron, D., A'Court, C., & Shaw, S. E. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16694 · Cited by 120
Pilnick, A., Trusson, D., Beeke, S., O’Brien, R., Goldberg, S., & Harwood, R. H. (2018) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1381-1 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- ten Have, P.
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2007
- OpenAlex
- W407991494
- Cited by
- 1,453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 86.78
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing Conversation Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781849208895
- The paper
- ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
