The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Narratives in Social Science Research
Abstract
The Narrative Turn in Social Studies How Stories Are Made Collecting Stories Narratives in an Interview Situation Reading Narratives Structural Analyses Close Readings Poststructuralism, Interruption, Deconstruction Reading Social Sciences Writing Social Sciences Narrativizing Social Sciences
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508412448695 · Cited by 759
Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration
Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003 · Cited by 622
Characterizing Value as an Experience: Implications for Service Researchers and Managers
Helkkula, A., Kelleher, C., & Pihlström, M. (2012) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670511426897 · Cited by 605
(2015) · Cited by 568
Entrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy
Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0915 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Czarniawska, B.
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2004
- OpenAlex
- W54101659
- Cited by
- 2,575
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Narratives in Social Science Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781849209502
- The paper
- Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in Social Science Research. SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
